Hmmmm? Why would someone submitt any of these?

relicsncoins

Strange Submission

RyGuy

I would dearly hope for sentimental reasons only, but then again, why not just buy some cheaper plastic holders?

AUandAG

Birth years? Or, just learning?

bob

WoodenJefferson

all three are error coins

relicsncoins

<< <i>all three are error coins >>



Ahhhh, good catch. I didn't bother to click on the line item numbers.

BXBOY143

<< <i>

<< <i>all three are error coins >>



Ahhhh, good catch. I didn't bother to click on the line item numbers. >>




if you did would you have posted thisnthread???

tjkillian

How can a 1963 cent be considered "Red" if it is struck on a silver 10c planchet?

Aegis3

<< <i>all three are error coins >>



Still doesn't explain why they should be submitted.

WoodenJefferson

Authentication

goodmoney4badmoney

<< <i>

<< <i>all three are error coins >>



Still doesn't explain why they should be submitted. >>



It's definately worth the money to submit a cent on a silver planchet.

GrumpyEd

<< <i>How can a 1963 cent be considered "Red" if it is struck on a silver 10c planchet? >>



That's funny! They might have it as only MS62 on the holder.

TwoSides2aCoin

It might have been an exercise in futility, but that's just a guess.

Connecticoin

Here is line item 3:

Cert Verification #: 15726205
PCGS Coin #: E2884
Date, mintmark: 1963
Denomination: 1C
Variety:
Minor Variety:
Mint Error: Struck on Silver 10C Plan
Pedigree:
Country: The United States of America
Grade: MS62RD
Mintage: 754,110,000
PCGS Price GuideSM Value: $4

Whoever owns it, it will give you 20% OVER PCGS Price guide.

GrumpyEd

<< <i>Whoever owns it, it will give you 20% OVER PCGS Price guide. >>



Yep, they should say "unknown" for the price of any error instead of pricing as a normal coin.