Toggle navigation
Quick Links:
Collectors Corner
|
PCGS
|
PSA
|
PSE
|
Collectors.com
|
CU
|
Coinflation
Categories
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
U.S. Coin Forum
.
GoldenEyeNumismatics
Posts:
13,187
✭✭✭
August 24, 2009 8:17AM
in
U.S. Coin Forum
nevermind.
0
Comments
STONE
Posts:
15,275
✭
August 24, 2009 8:18AM
AU-50
The apparent lack of luster stops me at that grade
0
Rampage
Posts:
9,496
✭✭✭✭✭
August 24, 2009 8:21AM
I say VF35, but would enjoy it as an XF. Not enough luster to warrant the AU50 grade. It is a very nice coin and date.
0
SUMORADA
Posts:
4,797
✭
August 24, 2009 8:21AM
+1
coins on ebay
0
bfjohnson
Posts:
541
✭✭✭
August 24, 2009 8:47AM
XF40 or 45 for the 1904-S, nice.
BarberSet
0
19Lyds
Posts:
26,492
✭✭✭✭
August 24, 2009 9:03AM
<< <i>AU-50
The apparent lack of luster stops me at that grade >>
An AU grade requires at least some evidence of luster.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
The name is LEE!
0
Leave a Comment
Bold
Italic
Strikethrough
Ordered list
Unordered list
Format
Spoiler
Code
Quote
Heading 2
Heading 1
Emoji
Url
Image
Align left
Align center
Align right
Toggle HTML view
Toggle full page
Toggle lights
Drop image/file
Home
•
U.S. Coin Forum
Comment As ...
Comments
The apparent lack of luster stops me at that grade
I say VF35, but would enjoy it as an XF. Not enough luster to warrant the AU50 grade. It is a very nice coin and date.
<< <i>AU-50
The apparent lack of luster stops me at that grade >>
An AU grade requires at least some evidence of luster.
The name is LEE!