Home U.S. Coin Forum

1882 Wm. Penn/Pennsylvania Bicentennial Medal

jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭✭✭
I originally posted most of this in an earlier thread nearly three years ago, but most of the other pictures from that thread are gone, and it would be just confusing to ttt it.

This is what Julian has to say about this US Mint medal:

"
These medals were originally struck in brass for distribution during the parade of October 24, 1882. Elaborate plans were made by a special committee of mint officers and workmen headed by Coiner Oliver C. Bosbyshell to have 250 men specially dressed in the parade line. There was to be a wagon drawn by six horses, carrying a steam press, from which newly-struck medals would be thrown to the crowds. Bosbyshell arranged for 50,000 brass planchets while the official city committee subscribed for another 25,000. All 75,000 were struck and distributed. These were, of course, unbronzed, but pieces struck since that time (in the mint), for sale to collectors, have had the regular bronzing applied after striking.

There was considerable newspaper publicity about the medals being struck during the parade and collectors from around the country made application to Superintendent Snowden for the medals. At first these applications were refused, but it is probably that the mint began striking them for sale because of the demand.

Two gold and one hundred silver medals were reported in the fiscal 1883 report.
"


This is a silver version. In addition to nicely mirrored cameo surfaces, it has a very square edge. I bought this raw and it is now slabbed as PF-65.

image

This one is an odd duck. The surfaces are very smooth and the lettering is sharp, but the edges are not square. The chocolate brown color is typical of 19th century US Mint products. My best guess is that this might be one of the "pieces struck since that time (in the mint) for sale to collectors, [which] have had the regular bronzing applied after striking."

image

This is the first of this pieces that I purchased, almost 5 years ago. It's clearly Unc rather than Proof, but much nicer than these are usually found. If you asked me, though, I would say that the coloring looks more like copper than brass. I assume that it really is one of the 75,000 brass pieces that Julian describes, but I can't account for the coloring.

image

This one is another odd duck, and the reason for posting today. I bought it on eBay from a mediocre picture without knowing what I was bidding on. From the eBay picture, it certainly looked like it was in better-than-average condition, and that's why I bid. The color in the eBay picture seemed odd -- too yellow for a regular 1882 brass version (above), and also too yellow for a modern restrike (below). I figured the colors were simply off... but nope! I reshot this one and the modern one (below) today with exactly the same lighting, and you can see that the colors really are different. The lettering on this one is much sharper than on the modern one, and the fields are smooth. As far as I can tell, it must be a gilt bronze 1882 strike. Julian doesn't list any of these in gilt bronze, and I don't have any auction records either. The lack of auction records isn't totally surprising -- it's easy to assume this is a normal 1882 strike or a modern restrike unless you have them all to compare side by side... as in this post, for example... image

image

This one clearly is brass, but not of 1882 vintage. This is the "yellow brass" that is typical of 20th century ("modern") US Mint restrikes. The surfaces are uniformly matte across the design, lettering, and fields.

image


Anyone know where I can get one of the two gold specimens? image

jonathan

Comments

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file