Home Sports Talk

College coaches really need to do their background checks on recruits - exhibit A

Detroit Free Press:

Rich Rodriguez said Monday that he had no idea former Michigan football player Justin Feagin had dealt drugs in high school, as Feagin admitted to police in July. He also said he didn't know Feagin had been arrested twice in high school, as Feagin told police.

Rodriguez said "as soon as we found out" that Feagin had apparently brokered a cocaine deal in his first semester on campus, he dismissed him. "That instant," Rodriguez said.

I will take Rodriguez at his word. But other questions need to be asked, starting with this:

Should he have known?

Feagin was a late addition to Rodriguez's first recruiting class. There is a perception that coaches rushed to fill positions and didn't do their due diligence on every player, and that is how Feagin slipped through.

Rodriguez has not said that, and for good reason: It's isn't true.

The fact is Rodriguez had been recruiting Justin Feagin for several months. He did not just discover him in late January 2008 and sign him in early February.

Rodriguez and his quarterbacks coach, Rod Smith, originally wanted Feagin to join them at West Virginia. Willie Bueno, Feagin's high school coach, said Monday that Rodriguez and Smith had offered Feagin a scholarship to West Virginia. Bueno said the Mountaineers' staff recruited Feagin for several months.

Should Rodriguez have known about Feagin's transgressions? Well, Bueno said Monday that he didn't know. But frankly that raises questions about Bueno, and it shows the importance of relationships for college coaches. They have to really know the communities where they recruit, and they must be sure that coaches and administrators are informed and honest with them.

The fact that Rodriguez was recruiting Feagin to West Virginia is telling because Rodriguez took considerable heat for some of his recruiting choices in Morgantown. Most noteworthy: Rodriguez signed linebacker Pat Lazear to a letter of intent even though Lazear had been accused of orchestrating an armed robbery of a Smoothie King store.

"That was a situation that was cleared up before he left high school," Rodriguez said Monday.

Well, that depends on your definition of "cleared up." Lazear pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit robbery. He was sentenced to 10 days in jail and received a 10-year suspended sentence for his part in the robbery. He also was sentenced to 30 days of house arrest and 150 hours of community service. And in a previous incident, Lazear had been found guilty of using a stolen credit card.

I guess you could say his situation was "cleared up."

Now back to Feagin. His cohort in the coke deal, T.J. Burke, told police it was "common knowledge that Feagin sold marijuana." And Feagin said he had been in a fight in Studio 4 in Ann Arbor and that police were called.

Yet Rodriguez said that "there was no negatives until that recent thing" -- in other words, he never heard about trouble involving Feagin until July.

No coach knows everything. But it is part of the coach's job to know as much as he possibly can. And after the Lazear and Feagin incidents, people are going to ask questions.

Rodriguez said something else Monday that I found interesting:

"Trust me, no coach in America is going to want to take a guy that has baggage or that they think he is bad guy."

Sorry, but that is laughably untrue. If you have followed college sports at all, you know that plenty of coaches will take guys with baggage if they think it will help them win.

Rich Rodriguez says he isn't one of them. In time, we'll find out if that's true.




Comments

  • dirtmonkeydirtmonkey Posts: 3,048 ✭✭
    Kids getting into trouble is nothing new. Coaches can't just ignore a recruit because he's been in legal trouble before. Most kids have done something illegal, it's just a matter of whether or not they got caught. That being said, a kid selling drugs would likely be a kid I'd look over. I suspect the University would prefer RR did as well. Other crimes, such as violent ones, are also likely to be looked at as kids that need to be passed over. Well, unless you're Michigan St. Apparently you can beat a hockey player to within an inch of his life, then get released after a short sentence having 6 months suspended. All this on the day their first practice starts... Convenient? Well, he is expected to be their first string RB, so it's probably no coincidence. image
    image
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Oh come on let's be honest, in the past 10 years many college programs have only given lip service to recruiting student athletes. Its a good decade for many schools if less than 20 of their athletes have been arrested. The NCAA has had to instigate graduation requirements to stop a debacle from happening. I don't blame the colleges as much as I do the yeehaw fans who live and die with college football results. The colleges are only producing what the fans demand and have allowed less than qualified, felons and druggies to arrive on our college campuses. The Big Ten, Pac Ten, Big 12 and especially the SEC and Florida schools are all guilty.

    What do we do we blame the NCAA when we should be blaming ourselves. We have forsaken integrity, responsibility, and common good just for the sake of arguing who has the better college team. We belittle these programs from all angles including appearance of the coach to lengths of times they have competed for top bowl games but turn a blind eye to the whoring of recruiting. Shows you where are values are when major programs can't even graduate 50% of their football players and maybe 20% of their BB players. Unfortunately for every Tim Tebow on the FL team there are a dozen lawbreakersor more who have been booted out of Gatorland, but we celebrate them as the model of what to do. There are dozens of other programs that reflect the same kind of twisted thinking.

    Edited to add: Rich Rod is just another example of how universities have sold what they stood for to achieve a winning program. Sadly his kind is the wave of the future.
  • dirtmonkeydirtmonkey Posts: 3,048 ✭✭
    Well I'm typically a firm believer in second chances, so anything an athlete did before arriving on campus is in the past. Don't get me wrong here. That doesn't mean I'd bring in the worst of the worst just to win. If I were a coach and met a kid with past issues but felt he had matured and they were behind him, I'd gladly bring them in if I thought they would fit into the program. My problem is that when these kids come to campus and STILL continue to screw up, the boot needs to be applied in most cases if the problem were severe enough. What kind of message are you sending if you tell them it was okay to screw up in the past, but then allow them to continue to do so without consequence? Too many college athletes these days are "beating their girlfriends" on Thurdays and still starting come Saturday. That's where I hold the university/coach accountable.
    image
  • MichiganMichigan Posts: 4,942
    Well, unless you're Michigan St. Apparently you can beat a hockey player to within an inch of his life, then get released after a short sentence having 6 months suspended. All this on the day their first practice starts... Convenient? Well, he is expected to be their first string RB, so it's probably no coincidence.


    Coincidence? .... perish the thought image
  • MichiganMichigan Posts: 4,942
    The MSU coach says the player will have some conditions placed on him after returning,
    I don't know if that will involve playing time or not.
  • dirtmonkeydirtmonkey Posts: 3,048 ✭✭


    << <i>The MSU coach says the player will have some conditions placed on him after returning,
    I don't know if that will involve playing time or not. >>



    The conditions are as long as he continues to earn the starting job, he wont be benched. LOL
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.