<< <i> the card is owned by a man who is not a card collector, but has had the card for more than 30 years. Prior to that, Bill told us, the card was used as a boomark by the man's grandfather. >>
An expensive bookmark Bob!
Thanx for sharing - nice read on your web.
The use of similar 'stock' photos seemed pervasive back then:
On the rarity of this card - I think the idea that the card was a 'prototype' or proof for a future set as part of a game is more than likely - as may have been the case with any (or none) of the nearly 1/1 types cards/sets that are out there.
Since this is Ruth, I would think the competition for the card may be entertaining! mike
PSA can do a little better on the flip....... little more info please.
Its a 1921 E-Unc. Shotwell Confectionery card, related to E121 or W575-1A, or as many call them the "E121 group"
It is from a prototype set that was never issued as planed, similar to the Herpolsheimer cards of the same year. Even the design is like the Herp cards from the same year (Herp cards are also unique ie a single known card for each player, no dups)
Comments
<< <i> the card is owned by a man who is not a card collector, but has had the card for more than 30 years. Prior to that, Bill told us, the card was used as a boomark by the man's grandfather. >>
An expensive bookmark Bob!
Thanx for sharing - nice read on your web.
The use of similar 'stock' photos seemed pervasive back then:
On the rarity of this card - I think the idea that the card was a 'prototype' or proof for a future set as part of a game is more than likely - as may have been the case with any (or none) of the nearly 1/1 types cards/sets that are out there.
Since this is Ruth, I would think the competition for the card may be entertaining!
mike
ON ITS WAY TO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
Just added your "unique" blog to My Favorites!
TexOma
<< <i>I wonder why PSA has never tried to fix the mylar sleeve thing? There has to be a better looking alternative? >>
I personally like the sleeves. To many dented edges from loose fitting holders out there.
I would say PSA 5, 6 or 7, from what I see...
<< <i>Great looking card!
I would say PSA 5, 6 or 7, from what I see... >>
It probably would've if not for the tear halfway down the right-hand side of the card.
Still a nice card though
Thanks for sharing it with us Bob
Steve
Its a 1921 E-Unc. Shotwell Confectionery card, related to E121 or W575-1A, or as many call them the "E121 group"
It is from a prototype set that was never issued as planed, similar to the Herpolsheimer cards of the same year. Even the design is like the Herp cards from the same year (Herp cards are also unique ie a single known card for each player, no dups)