Grades Posted Today...............(Actually - Last Week!)
![image](http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u8/lcl1119/Misc/PCGSSubmission3975335.jpg)
Now I don't know what to do!
I purchased the 1965 from a local dealer whose more into stamps than coins and he none of his coins are graded. He pulled this SMS set out alonmg with the 1964 Proof set.
I could see it was a really nice Half.
He could see it was a really nice Half.
I asked how much and he replied with something like $25 which is well above bid. I accepted and submitted. The 1964 Quarter came from the 1964 Proof set I also bough for well over bid.
Should I share the grade with the dealer or perhaps sell the 1965 and split the profits? What? I wanna do the right thing you know.
BTW, the two 77-D's are DDO coins and that 1964 Kennedy Proof is under graded by at least 10 points and then they forgot the dang DCAM desgination buts thats for a different post.
The 1972? I'm still trying to figure out why I sent that in?
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
The name is LEE!
The name is LEE!
0
Comments
I say he made money when you walked out the door and was more than happy to let you buy them at that price. If he wanted to spend 10 minutes on every coin looking for every possible thing someone else might find, he would have to charge 3x the money he is already.
is owed to anyone at this point, IMO.
<< <i>He sold you the coins raw for an agreed upon price. YOU chose to submit them and pay the associated costs. Nothing
is owed to anyone at this point, IMO. >>
Right.
<< <i>He sold you the coins raw for an agreed upon price. YOU chose to submit them and pay the associated costs. Nothing
is owed to anyone at this point, IMO. >>
AAH but the varieties...that is what we speak of.....
Not to mention the premium for a cameo etc.
He's just a poor stamp guy.
And I'm sure most board members will miss the irony in this post.
<< <i>Should I share the grade with the dealer or perhaps sell the 1965 and split the profits? What? I wanna do the right thing you know. >>
Just do whatever you think is right Lee.
Damn the righteous arm of the forum morality boosters!
Just think about this though:
If you split the profit with DealerMcWheeler we'd have to revoke your Master Cherrypicker status.
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
Actually, you should contact the mint and find out who was working the day that coin was minted and then give that person or their heirs some kind of gift...
<< <i>perhaps a no FG on the 72? >>
Those are only on the 1972-D coins.
The name is LEE!
<< <i>
<< <i>He sold you the coins raw for an agreed upon price. YOU chose to submit them and pay the associated costs. Nothing
is owed to anyone at this point, IMO. >>
AAH but the varieties...that is what we speak of.....
Not to mention the premium for a cameo etc.
He's just a poor stamp guy.
And I'm sure most board members will miss the irony in this post. >>
I hope I didn't mislead anybody but the 77-D's came from 5 rolls I picked up for an insane price off of eBay. I do get crazy once in a while!
The name is LEE!
You don't owe your friend anything, but if you go back next month and say "I made a few bucks on the half you sold me and I'm here to spend them with you", I expect he'll appreciate the consideration and give you a look at some more goodies later.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
<< <i>If you split the profit with DealerMcWheeler we'd have to revoke your Master Cherrypicker status.
Nobody's suppose to know!
The name is LEE!
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
I just don't buy into the "screw the other guy he should have known" mentality that is apparently prevelent in this business.
Not my approach to things in general.
<< <i>Put up pics of the half when it comes home.
You don't owe your friend anything, but if you go back next month and say "I made a few bucks on the half you sold me and I'm here to spend them with you", I expect he'll appreciate the consideration and give you a look at some more goodies later. >>
Here's the SP67CA Kennedy:
The funny thing about this is that even though the PCGS Database says SP67CA, the slab label says MS67CAM!
If I ever sell it, I hope folks don;t think its a counterfeit since the database doesn't match the actual slab!
Here's the PR67CA Washington:
I don't understand why DCAM wasn't designated but what do I know??
The PR66 1964 Kennedy Looks almost CAM in hand which is why I submitted it but the scan kinda wipes everything out.
I'm a little disappointed with the Kennedy but all-in-all, pleased with the submission results.
The name is LEE!
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.americanlegacycoins.com
Thanks.
Lee,
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>
Now I don't know what to do!
Yes you do!
Should I share the grade with the dealer or perhaps sell the 1965 and split the profits? What? I wanna do the right thing you know.
You both agreed to the sale, he made his $10-15 and was probably quite happy. Any profit you make after the purchase is solely yours.
BTW, the two 77-D's are DDO coins and that 1964 Kennedy Proof is under graded by at least 10 points and then they forgot the dang DCAM desgination buts thats for a different post.
Well, mistakes happen...
The 1972? I'm still trying to figure out why I sent that in? >>
Pretty toning possibly?
<< <i>
<< <i>
Now I don't know what to do!
Yes you do!
Should I share the grade with the dealer or perhaps sell the 1965 and split the profits? What? I wanna do the right thing you know.
You both agreed to the sale, he made his $10-15 and was probably quite happy. Any profit you make after the purchase is solely yours.
BTW, the two 77-D's are DDO coins and that 1964 Kennedy Proof is under graded by at least 10 points and then they forgot the dang DCAM desgination buts thats for a different post.
Well, mistakes happen...
The 1972? I'm still trying to figure out why I sent that in? >>
Pretty toning possibly? >>
I think I just threw the 72 in to see what it would grade as toning was definitely not an issue!
The name is LEE!
Edited to add some bigger pics
Grades that is!
I've got some 67's that have slide marks on the shield which IMO limit the coins to MS64. How they got a 67 is beyond me!
BTW the obverse of your coin, even though its toned nicely, has evidence of very strong die erosion. I don;t think PCGS likes that too much.
The name is LEE!