Here we go again 324 image attempt

edueku · June 28, 2009 7:49AM

[/URL][/IMG]

edueku · June 28, 2009 7:50AM

[/URL][/IMG] [/IMG]

OK well that worked sort of but it's awfully small.

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:13AM

A better larger scan, click here

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:14AM

Hmmm... now I can't get that link to work.

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:15AM

Maybe this one...

Give this link a try

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:18AM

Another one...Maybe this one?

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:19AM

Crud now they ALL seem to work!

rolew1946 · June 28, 2009 8:21AM

I just did the same image manipulation with your image as I did with the 98J and they are both the same. That issue appears to have poorly aligned perf wheels.

edueku · June 28, 2009 8:25AM

Are you talking about the actual ANGLE of the row of perf holes on any given side OR whether the perf holes themselves line up with the corresponding holes on the opposite side of the stamp?

Oh and on the imageshack link you can rotate the stamp around , I always do this when trying to judge centering.

edueku · June 30, 2009 4:47PM

I was told, that without faults, this stamp is in the 95-98 range so I am likely to get at least a second highest graded example when I submit. This is a really difficult stamp so I am excited to have it graded. Too bad the PSE discount promo ended the 30th.

Here we go again 324 image attempt

Comments