The Pirates actually have an abundance of outfielders. A trade of McLouth opens a spot up for McCutchen to play everyday. They are getting Gorkys Hernandez back from the Braves, so it isnt as bad of a trade as it sounds and they are dumping salary to boot.
I have seen McCutchen play in Indy a ton and he hasn't impressed. I will be shocked if he is as good as McClouth. They had McClouth under a good contract for many years it doesn't make alot of sense for the prospects they got. Gorkys is going to be mirred in the OF log jam. Morton is a mid pack starter if he pans out 100% and Locke is the best prospect but again in freaking single A.
Tabata the big prospect they got last year is in AA so we are 2 to 3 years away from these guys really helping.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
Here is the Pirates logic from past trades. Trade for crap people don't want at a discount and hope the improve or are better than anyone thought. When that doesn't work trade your best player for more crap and minor leaguers that won't help for 2 to 3 years.
Crap from last year that we kept instead of a good player like McClouth
Brandon Moss- crap Craig Hansen- crap with control issues. Daniel McCutchen- in the minors Jose Tabata- in the minors Jeff Karstens-crap Andy Laroche- craptastic last year but showing some signs of getting better but 0 power for a corner infielder.
Non Crap Ross Ohlendorf- mediocre starter
Wow 2 AS and 1 really good until hurt OF's and we get 1 mediocre starter, 1 mediocre at best 3B that is gone once Alvarez is ready and a bunch of minor leaguers and crap.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
Anybody from Pgh. knows that the Pirates, no matter what PR front says, is not truly interested in winning, or more accurately, to put there $ where there mouth is. (Oh wait--they don't really have any $...)
They have a nice little park and enough loyal fans to fill it 90% for the year and are not willing to spend more than $40M a year on payroll to generate more fan support. Why spend $20M extra on payroll for an extra $5M in added fan/sponsor support? Pretty simple math...
They know that the fans and their pierogie (sp) eating children will ultimately show up to eat hot dogs and enjoy the ball park (a very nice one BTW--one of the few actual good decisions made by the Pirates at the expense of taxpayers but screw them anyway, go Bucs!). Seriously, screw those old timers..
Yes, they are never going to publicly admit this is what is happening. And yes, they will put a team out each spring with the hope that they can hit lightening in a bottle and actually field a competitive team. When this doesn't happen (see: last 16 years) they: trade away good players (ex: JBay) with the promise of receiving prospects and blame MLB for its skewed policy toward big market teams.
After all of this, PGH fans piss and moan, but at the end of the day, show up at the park and visit the Manny Seguillen BBQ pit for an affordable $10 plate of ribs, cold slaw, and beans. Look honey! We can see all 3 rivers!
I saw a game in Pitt 2-3 yrs ago.. and really liked it.. it fealt like wrigley east maybe thats what it is.. ownership will let the stadium draw the fans in..
although the cubs do try to win.. and do spend a lot in payroll.. and the tickets in Pitt were pretty dang cheap for great seats
You can get pretty decent bleacher seats for $10 but you don't have a "seat" per se but sit on a bench. Plus there are a bunch of drunk loud mouths but if you are willing to put up with that or are one of those people, it's worth it. (think: Bill).
The allure of the park will eventually wear off on Pirates fans, although what else is there to do in PGH during the summer? (Answer: Not much).
for $14 per ticket.. I got front row outfield about 50 feet off the left field line.. and it was assigned seating in that part.. I have been to a few stadiums and that was my favorite so far.. beautiful..
Yes, great prices. But here's an even better deal. I can show up with my buddy to a Durham Bulls game and get in for free (after the 6th inning). Watch the game, shout some stuff, and maybe even win a free steak if we hit the big bull bulletin board in left field!
BTW the DBULLS are the AAA team for the Tampa Bay Rays (no longer "Devil" Rays) and have David Price on their team and last year even Longoria. I think Price has been called up...
as a Pirate fan the trade isn't that bad. Do they have a long jam in the outfield NO!!!. Is Morgan the real answer in LF No is Moss in RF No. With in the 2 two years, You'll have McCutchen , Tabata and Hernandez in the outfield for the Pirates. McCutchen is having a nice year in triple A. McCutchen should be called up any day now. Tabata is going to be a stud and I like what I've read about Hernandez. I like what the Pirates are doing.
"EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY IT SAYS IT RIGHT THERE ON THE WALL" - JACKIE MOON
Here's the thing, the Pirates will be extremely lucky if one of Tabata, McCutchen and especially Gorkys Hernandez are as good as McClouth. The pirates are just spinning their wheels here. They had McClouth under a good contract. Now they have to hope, again, that these guys pan out to be as good as they "hope".
I have seen McCutchen play in AAA, tons. He misses signs, steals in wrong situations, misses cut off men, makes horrible base running decisions and swings and misses alot. I don't have the same optimisim others have on him. Again, if he pans out 100%, he is projected to be slightly better than McClouth hitting and lots better defensively. McClouth was a known quantity.
If the Pirates had gotten a sure fire ML ready pitcher I would be much happier.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
Trading stars for unproven prospects that may or may not become stars is a pretty risky gamble... especially when the front office makes bone head movies like passing on all the talent in the 2002 draft and picking pitcher Bryan Bullington #1, who was waved a few years later.
Well if nothing else this current Pirate ownership isn't as horrendous as the last group who killed the Pirates with Matt Morris's salary...and signing middling MIers like F.Sanchez and Jack Wilson to contracts that pay them $6-8m a year. It was the last group who gave away Aramis Ramirez. It was the last group who didn't draft Wieters. It was the last group who is associated with names like Bullington, Van Beschtochen, Bobby Bradley, Moskos and Burnett. Those are Littlefield and Bonifay's mistakes. At least this group is spending money on the draft...teams like the Padres would kill for this new front office.
McClouth is what he is. His outstanding first half last year is not what he is. In his last 400 ABs he is hitting .261 with 13 homers, and 66 RBIs....and he is approaching his 28th birthday, the time at which the all-time graph of batters suggests improvements stop. The great hitters plateau at the peak. The others begin their descent. What you are seeing with McLouth now is what you are likely going to get in the future. Around 20-25 homers, around 20 steals, around a .265-.270 batting average and when the Pirates can be conceivably competitive in say the next 2 or 3 years his contract would be up and you'd be losing him in FA. I don't bebrudge Pirates ownership for dealing him at his peak the question will be the prospects they have received in the McClouth and Bay trades. Nady is an average corner OFer, he doesn't matter...but the Pirates took on two high ceiling but questionable 4 star(Baseball Prospectus) prospects in Jose Tabata and Gorkys Hernandez...and I think that could be the problem with those two trades. The Pirates weren't going to get Tommy Hanson in the Braves trade but they could have pushed for OFer Jason Heyward or even Jordan Schafer but like the 3-way trade last year the Pirates went for quantity over quality...and despite all the high picks the Pirates have had in the last 10 years there isn't a wealth of talent in the minors. If Jeff Locke solves his control issues he's a viable mid rotation starter, Morton is at best a #4 or 5 SP. Andy LaRoche has hit as many as 30 HRs in the minors but at PNC he'll likely peak at around 20 and play very good D. Jack Wilson and Adam LaRoche's contracts are up after this year and F.Sanchez has an option so conceivably he could be gone too. In the LA trade they also received Bryan Morris a 3 star prospect who could also become a mid rotation SP. The Pirates have a slew of mid to back of the rotation SPs and no high ceiling ace quality in the majors or minors so really McClouth wouldn't help them be more than NL Central bottom feeders anyway. The next 2-3 drafts are what Pirates fans should worry about...because they need high upside SP....not a 28 year old CFer who belonged at a corner OF position anyway...and I'm sure that the Pirates were intentionally keeping him in CF and the speedy Nyjer Morgan in LF to maintain McClouth's value because .265/23/80/20 at a corner OF position is a very good but not great player.
Trading stars for unproven prospects that may or may not become stars is a pretty risky gamble... especially when the front office makes bone head movies like passing on all the talent in the 2002 draft and picking pitcher Bryan Bullington #1, who was waved a few years later. >>
I don't even want to hear the players complain. They are part of the blame. They are still a roster full of major leaguers, and if they didn't play like complete crap, then maybe players would be kept. I know that this is not the major reason, but they need to evaluate their own performances instead of the front office's moves.
<< <i>because they need high upside SP....not a 28 year old CFer >>
This is exactly my problem with the last 3 trades. We didn't get anything close to a #1/2 Sp in any of the trades. You can't tell me Bay, Nady and Mclouth together aren't worth 1 great SP prospect? The Bay deal was the most disappointing in that we got nothing IMO for the guy. Having a slew of "prospects" sucks compared to 1 to 2 sure thing MLers that can help you now.
Come on, this whole McClouth/Bay/Nady wouldn't help in the next 3 years anyway thing is BS to fans. Stocking a team full of mediocre MLers and prospects is hard on fans who have seen players leave and become stars somewhere else. You have to have some reason to watch a team play.
Why not just have the Pirates go on a 3 year "leave of absence" from MLB and concentrate on "developing" these great prospects and come back when they actually have a ML team. It is shameful to have to watch this crap every year.
I have no faith that Nyjer Morgan or McCutchen are going to be anywhere close to Bay let alone McClouth. Name the last great ML OFer that the Pirates have generated through their farm system???????? (hint Bay was traded for)
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
the Pirates weren't going to get Tommy Hanson in the McClouth trade...the Braves wouldn't give him up in the Peavy deal so that wasn't happening and he's the only elite pitching prospect the Braves have at this point....McClouth wasn't going to command a 5 star SP prospect anyway. Since the Bay trade was a 3 way including Manny, the Red Sox were eating all of Manny's remaining contract for the Dodgers so they weren't going to have to give up much in any trade and they didn't by sending off B.Moss and Hansen to the Pirates side in addition to Manny so they actually gave up quite a bit to get Bay and that's mainly because he was under contract for this season at a fair market price. There was no way the Pirates could have asked for Clay Buchholz or even Michael Bowden from the Red Sox's end since they were already giving up Manny and $ so it had to come from the Dodgers end. Obviously the Dodgers weren't going to give up Kershaw since he was already in their rotation so that would have left possible options like James McDonald or Scott Elbert from the Dodgers system. McDonald is not ace material and I have no idea if Scott Elbert(rated as a 4 star prospect by BP) was discussed instead of Andy LaRoche but even if he was he's no lock himself...he's had control and injury issues. So it came down to LaRoche and given the Dodgers just traded for Casey Blake and have 2 or 3 other 3B prospects in their system I guess that was the call. He might not have the 30 HR potential that you'd like from 3B but he can hit .300 with 20 HRs and play good D. So in the end Huntington didn't do that badly in the trade as he also snagged Bryan Morris who could be a #3 type SP, and taking a flyer on Hansen as a possible closer wasn't a terrible idea...he looked like a change of scenery guy...but it's hard to say had the Pirates kept Bay until this year to deal him if the Pirates would have gotten more...probably not given the economy and what FA OFers signed for in the off-season and the decision might not have been his...could have been made by ownership. There was trade rumor last year at the deadline involving Bay to the Rays but the rumored players coming back were never really released. If the Pirates could have gotten say SP prospect Wade Davis from the Rays' system then that would have been a plus but I think the deal was nixed because the Rays wanted the Pirates to pay for the remaining portion of Bay's 2008 contract...allegedly
Not signing Tanner Scheppers whom the Pirates drafted in the second round looks like a big mistake...granted he was coming off of surgery but he's going to wind up being a top 10 pick this year and that would have given the Pirates one top tier SP prospect. The only problem with the McClouth trade if I were a Pirates fan was that allegedly the Pirates didn't shop him and that Huntington was so impressed with the Braves random offer he jumped at it. Who knows what he could have gotten from a more open market...teams rarely trade elite pitching prospects anyway so perhaps this is the best they could do.
You just have to hope Tabata and Hernandez pan out...McCutchen looks like he's going to be a pretty good player and Alvarez is on the way to go along with Andy LaRoche and Doumit...you'll have at least $15-20 million coming off the books after this year and the Pirates are going hard after a 16 year old Dominican prospect named Miguel Angel Sano and really as a Pirates fan you can only look at how the Brewers and Reds have put together their good young teams by building from the draft because losing Bay and McClouth in trades aren't the Pirates problem, this is the Pirates problem.
Last 10 #1 Draft Picks
1999 Bobby Bradley 2000 Sean Burnett 2001 John Van Benschoten 2002 Bryan Bullington 2003 Paul Maholm 2004 Neil Walker 2005 Andrew McCutchen 2006 Brad Lincoln 2007 Daniel Moskos 2008 Pedro Alvarez
until last year the Pirates always drafted based on signability ie being cheap....like the Padres and Twins..except in the Twins case they always find later round picks who turn out to be just as good and they have a great instructional system...something else the Pirates seem to lack because all of the highly touted prospects they've had have either washed out to injury or have woefully underperfomed like Neil Walker. So if nothing else at least this new ownership group is looking to improve via the draft and spending the money to get the best players they can instead of who fits in their budget.
My question for the Pirates management is where is the power coming from? We don't play in 3 Rivers on turf anymore, so trying to put together a lineup of speedsters isn't going to cut it unless the pitching staff manages a sub-3.00 ERA. Without a bonefide power hitter in the line-up they will continue to struggle to score runs. I was hoping Alvarez would come up next year but I'm not encouraged by his .240 batting average at A ball. Sure would have been nice to have Wieters. Do you think the Os would trade him for Moskos at this point?
I am a happy Bucco fan. With Cuth and Nyjer as 1-2, gives us great opportunities to jump out to an early lead. Which will help with the pitchers confidence. I just wish the would have got Glavine instead of the scrub pitcher that was thrown in the deal.
The issue with Bay is they didn't have to trade him at that time. The Pirates have made it a pattern to trade players out of desperation. The Aramis Ramirez trade was a last minute thing that the owner demanded be done. Who knows what they could have gotten for Bay if they held out maybe more maybe less but you never trade out of desperation as teams basically will take advantage of you.
I wrote a few posts commenting how bad they have drafted as well. It is sad really but the thing about young players is there is no gurantees. What if Alvarez becomes a fat toad (he came to camp this spring overweight) and doesn't pan out? They have been unlucky in the players they should have drafted haven't panned out like Walker, Moskos.
You mention the Reds, but their trades gave players like Volquez which helped the ML team immediately. I am still not sure about how much Andy LaRoche will help but at least he has been much better this year than last. Adam is going away as well as Jack Wilson with no real ML caliber replacements in the minors. Alvarez won't be ready next year, Walker doesn't look ready so who is going to play SS and 1B?
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
The days of guys spending their whole career in Pittsburgh are over. We as Pirate fans have to wrap our heads around this. lanemyer85 has summarized the current approach vs. the previous regimes very well. This years draft as well as the Latin American signing period should be watched very closely. If they sign Sano and duplicate last years draft by signing multiple guys above slot, I'll be satisfied that they are keeping on track.
The downside of this approach is that when/if these current prospects start to produce at the MLB level, unless something changes, these players will be flipped again. The key is to have an abundant system with prospects ready to step in so you don't go from competitive to 100 losses. If the fans don't like it, maybe they should root for another team or start following the WNBA.
"I think the guy must be practicing voodoo or something. Check out his eyes. Rico's crazier than a peach orchard sow." -- Whitey Herzog, Spring Training 1973
Comments
McLouth traded for 1 rookie and 2 prospects
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Steve
Bosox1976
I also saw the Braves released Glavine.
How does Pirates GM Neal Huntington still have a job after giving away Jason Bay and McLouth?
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
<< <i> and they are dumping salary to boot. >>
So they can sign the next big free agent.
Tabata the big prospect they got last year is in AA so we are 2 to 3 years away from these guys really helping.
Crap from last year that we kept instead of a good player like McClouth
Brandon Moss- crap
Craig Hansen- crap with control issues.
Daniel McCutchen- in the minors
Jose Tabata- in the minors
Jeff Karstens-crap
Andy Laroche- craptastic last year but showing some signs of getting better but 0 power for a corner infielder.
Non Crap
Ross Ohlendorf- mediocre starter
Wow 2 AS and 1 really good until hurt OF's and we get 1 mediocre starter, 1 mediocre at best 3B that is gone once Alvarez is ready and a bunch of minor leaguers and crap.
They have a nice little park and enough loyal fans to fill it 90% for the year and are not willing to spend more than $40M a year on payroll to generate more fan support. Why spend $20M extra on payroll for an extra $5M in added fan/sponsor support? Pretty simple math...
They know that the fans and their pierogie (sp) eating children will ultimately show up to eat hot dogs and enjoy the ball park (a very nice one BTW--one of the few actual good decisions made by the Pirates at the expense of taxpayers but screw them anyway, go Bucs!). Seriously, screw those old timers..
Yes, they are never going to publicly admit this is what is happening. And yes, they will put a team out each spring with the hope that they can hit lightening in a bottle and actually field a competitive team. When this doesn't happen (see: last 16 years) they: trade away good players (ex: JBay) with the promise of receiving prospects and blame MLB for its skewed policy toward big market teams.
After all of this, PGH fans piss and moan, but at the end of the day, show up at the park and visit the Manny Seguillen BBQ pit for an affordable $10 plate of ribs, cold slaw, and beans. Look honey! We can see all 3 rivers!
Steve
maybe thats what it is.. ownership will let the stadium draw the fans in..
although the cubs do try to win.. and do spend a lot in payroll..
and the tickets in Pitt were pretty dang cheap for great seats
The allure of the park will eventually wear off on Pirates fans, although what else is there to do in PGH during the summer? (Answer: Not much).
I have been to a few stadiums and that was my favorite so far.. beautiful..
BTW the DBULLS are the AAA team for the Tampa Bay Rays (no longer "Devil" Rays) and have David Price on their team and last year even Longoria. I think Price has been called up...
I have seen McCutchen play in AAA, tons. He misses signs, steals in wrong situations, misses cut off men, makes horrible base running decisions and swings and misses alot. I don't have the same optimisim others have on him. Again, if he pans out 100%, he is projected to be slightly better than McClouth hitting and lots better defensively. McClouth was a known quantity.
If the Pirates had gotten a sure fire ML ready pitcher I would be much happier.
Trading stars for unproven prospects that may or may not become stars is a pretty risky gamble... especially when the front office makes bone head movies like passing on all the talent in the 2002 draft and picking pitcher Bryan Bullington #1, who was waved a few years later.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
How very shrewd of you. God forbid you drop a ten spot and get to see the whole game.
McClouth is what he is. His outstanding first half last year is not what he is. In his last 400 ABs he is hitting .261 with 13 homers, and 66 RBIs....and he is approaching his 28th birthday, the time at which the all-time graph of batters suggests improvements stop. The great hitters plateau at the peak. The others begin their descent. What you are seeing with McLouth now is what you are likely going to get in the future. Around 20-25 homers, around 20 steals, around a .265-.270 batting average and when the Pirates can be conceivably competitive in say the next 2 or 3 years his contract would be up and you'd be losing him in FA. I don't bebrudge Pirates ownership for dealing him at his peak the question will be the prospects they have received in the McClouth and Bay trades. Nady is an average corner OFer, he doesn't matter...but the Pirates took on two high ceiling but questionable 4 star(Baseball Prospectus) prospects in Jose Tabata and Gorkys Hernandez...and I think that could be the problem with those two trades. The Pirates weren't going to get Tommy Hanson in the Braves trade but they could have pushed for OFer Jason Heyward or even Jordan Schafer but like the 3-way trade last year the Pirates went for quantity over quality...and despite all the high picks the Pirates have had in the last 10 years there isn't a wealth of talent in the minors. If Jeff Locke solves his control issues he's a viable mid rotation starter, Morton is at best a #4 or 5 SP. Andy LaRoche has hit as many as 30 HRs in the minors but at PNC he'll likely peak at around 20 and play very good D. Jack Wilson and Adam LaRoche's contracts are up after this year and F.Sanchez has an option so conceivably he could be gone too. In the LA trade they also received Bryan Morris a 3 star prospect who could also become a mid rotation SP. The Pirates have a slew of mid to back of the rotation SPs and no high ceiling ace quality in the majors or minors so really McClouth wouldn't help them be more than NL Central bottom feeders anyway. The next 2-3 drafts are what Pirates fans should worry about...because they need high upside SP....not a 28 year old CFer who belonged at a corner OF position anyway...and I'm sure that the Pirates were intentionally keeping him in CF and the speedy Nyjer Morgan in LF to maintain McClouth's value because .265/23/80/20 at a corner OF position is a very good but not great player.
<< <i>Pirates players ask "WTF?"
Trading stars for unproven prospects that may or may not become stars is a pretty risky gamble... especially when the front office makes bone head movies like passing on all the talent in the 2002 draft and picking pitcher Bryan Bullington #1, who was waved a few years later. >>
I don't even want to hear the players complain. They are part of the blame. They are still a roster full of major leaguers, and if they didn't play like complete crap, then maybe players would be kept. I know that this is not the major reason, but they need to evaluate their own performances instead of the front office's moves.
Always looking for Chipper Jones cards.
Im a very focused collector of cards from 1909 - 2012...LOL
<< <i>because they need high upside SP....not a 28 year old CFer >>
This is exactly my problem with the last 3 trades. We didn't get anything close to a #1/2 Sp in any of the trades. You can't tell me Bay, Nady and Mclouth together aren't worth 1 great SP prospect? The Bay deal was the most disappointing in that we got nothing IMO for the guy. Having a slew of "prospects" sucks compared to 1 to 2 sure thing MLers that can help you now.
Come on, this whole McClouth/Bay/Nady wouldn't help in the next 3 years anyway thing is BS to fans. Stocking a team full of mediocre MLers and prospects is hard on fans who have seen players leave and become stars somewhere else. You have to have some reason to watch a team play.
Why not just have the Pirates go on a 3 year "leave of absence" from MLB and concentrate on "developing" these great prospects and come back when they actually have a ML team. It is shameful to have to watch this crap every year.
I have no faith that Nyjer Morgan or McCutchen are going to be anywhere close to Bay let alone McClouth. Name the last great ML OFer that the Pirates have generated through their farm system???????? (hint Bay was traded for)
Not signing Tanner Scheppers whom the Pirates drafted in the second round looks like a big mistake...granted he was coming off of surgery but he's going to wind up being a top 10 pick this year and that would have given the Pirates one top tier SP prospect. The only problem with the McClouth trade if I were a Pirates fan was that allegedly the Pirates didn't shop him and that Huntington was so impressed with the Braves random offer he jumped at it. Who knows what he could have gotten from a more open market...teams rarely trade elite pitching prospects anyway so perhaps this is the best they could do.
You just have to hope Tabata and Hernandez pan out...McCutchen looks like he's going to be a pretty good player and Alvarez is on the way to go along with Andy LaRoche and Doumit...you'll have at least $15-20 million coming off the books after this year and the Pirates are going hard after a 16 year old Dominican prospect named Miguel Angel Sano and really as a Pirates fan you can only look at how the Brewers and Reds have put together their good young teams by building from the draft because losing Bay and McClouth in trades aren't the Pirates problem, this is the Pirates problem.
Last 10 #1 Draft Picks
1999 Bobby Bradley
2000 Sean Burnett
2001 John Van Benschoten
2002 Bryan Bullington
2003 Paul Maholm
2004 Neil Walker
2005 Andrew McCutchen
2006 Brad Lincoln
2007 Daniel Moskos
2008 Pedro Alvarez
until last year the Pirates always drafted based on signability ie being cheap....like the Padres and Twins..except in the Twins case they always find later round picks who turn out to be just as good and they have a great instructional system...something else the Pirates seem to lack because all of the highly touted prospects they've had have either washed out to injury or have woefully underperfomed like Neil Walker. So if nothing else at least this new ownership group is looking to improve via the draft and spending the money to get the best players they can instead of who fits in their budget.
I wrote a few posts commenting how bad they have drafted as well. It is sad really but the thing about young players is there is no gurantees. What if Alvarez becomes a fat toad (he came to camp this spring overweight) and doesn't pan out? They have been unlucky in the players they should have drafted haven't panned out like Walker, Moskos.
You mention the Reds, but their trades gave players like Volquez which helped the ML team immediately. I am still not sure about how much Andy LaRoche will help but at least he has been much better this year than last. Adam is going away as well as Jack Wilson with no real ML caliber replacements in the minors. Alvarez won't be ready next year, Walker doesn't look ready so who is going to play SS and 1B?
The downside of this approach is that when/if these current prospects start to produce at the MLB level, unless something changes, these players will be flipped again. The key is to have an abundant system with prospects ready to step in so you don't go from competitive to 100 losses. If the fans don't like it, maybe they should root for another team or start following the WNBA.