Just for the heck of it...what's your opinion of this Roosie?

eyoung429

stinkinlincoln

The obv isnt bad, but the rev fingerprints kill it for me. I dont do prints.

BlindedByEgo

Probably belongs right in the Whitman where it sits.

Myqqy

As far as prints go, that one is not too bad, but it's still a print, which makes it a little hard to love... like yes... love... uh probably not.

dorkkarl

very average coin

K S

291fifth

OK for an album set.

Colorfulcoins

Doesn't look FB/FT reverse, looks decently clean technically, probably better eye-appeal in person than it looks in the scan which looks low res.

cheezhed

I'm guessing that coin looks much better in hand.

lordmarcovan

I am in 100% agreement with every comment posted so far. It probably belongs in a raw album set, right where it is, and the fingerprint is a minor detraction but not horrible, making it an average coin overall. It's not bad looking and probably does look better in person.

I am neither excited nor totally disgusted with it.

Eh. It's OK.

ziggy29

It's a decent enough coin for where it is. If this is a leading question as to whether it should be slabbed, I would say it's not worth it.

lathmach

It's a silver 1963 Dime. In 1963 you could have bought a coffee with it in a restraurant.
Today, you can sell it for bullion, and get enough money to buy a cup of coffee to go, in a convenience store.
You ain't lost anything by keeping it.
Even as ugly as it is.

Ray

Bcsican

Ugly comes to mind...