A new (personal) coin classification: G.U.M.

meaning : looks "good until magnified" { or photographed- which sometimes brings out the worst or highlights the "unnoticed", in exaggerated fashion}
it has finally dawned on me that this might help to explain, or provide consistency to: MS 64 vs 65; or 65 vs higher-gem.
{I'll still be scratching my head over a number of coins I've seen, here and elsewhere, labeled MS66 or 67}
pix are welcomed.
edit: after a consensus* near-gem came back NGC MS62, I was afraid to send this one in:
M$ '79-O
*part of the consensus is the guy here who traded for it (BTW- I'm very pleased with the coins I received: seems like a win-win transaction)
it has finally dawned on me that this might help to explain, or provide consistency to: MS 64 vs 65; or 65 vs higher-gem.
{I'll still be scratching my head over a number of coins I've seen, here and elsewhere, labeled MS66 or 67}
pix are welcomed.
edit: after a consensus* near-gem came back NGC MS62, I was afraid to send this one in:
M$ '79-O
*part of the consensus is the guy here who traded for it (BTW- I'm very pleased with the coins I received: seems like a win-win transaction)
0
Comments
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
It is going to take a while for most newbies to learn how to grade. Many make the mistake of favoring marks or luster too much. Both are important. Luster is often the more difficult to get a handle on.
I'm also considering submitting a number of raws that I normally wouldn't bother with, chalking it up to educational expenses.
1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
Gawd Ugly Mess