Home U.S. Coin Forum

need response in next 6 min: 105mm macro lens

good enough over my 60mm lens to make a difference?

this is all I've found lately
(can't hang around and wait, or probly afford, a 150+)
WILL WORK FOR CENTS, QUARTERS, HALVES, DOLLARS....

1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
imagemy eBay

Comments

  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I use a 105mm Nikon.
    Make sure it is a MACRO type.
    Won't do you any good if it has to be three feet away.
    image
  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,279 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It would be better than a 60 if it's good glass.
    Larry

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    It'll make a difference. Can't put a quantity on it though. Signioficantly more working distance and secondarily better lighting capabilities.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have experience with a Canon 50mm and 100mm. There is a big difference is in the ability to uniformly light the coin with the 100mm.
  • adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    105mm is good.

    Och. If you could only get a 150+. Macro photography, in general, is much easier with the longest lens you can get.

    (I have the Canon 50 macro and the Canon 180 macro. I had the Canon 100 macro for a while but sold it.)
  • 150 mm offsets( to nikon) are going for nearly $1k, and there are none available locally. Nothing used either.

    I stumpled onto the auction on ebay in the waning moments, successfully "sniped" (altho I was willing to go significantly higher than I needed to).

    My 60s a great lens, but not for coins (getting tired of burning my forehead).

    I noticed that when trying to "simulate" extreme closeup work, I lose focus as one moves away from a "central focal area" (??), when compared to Mr Goodman's, e. g. - with bellows, etc showing fine die lines throughout the entire photographed area.

    Just a better ability to handle and distribute lighting should be huge.
    WILL WORK FOR CENTS, QUARTERS, HALVES, DOLLARS....

    1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
    imagemy eBay
  • adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    I know it does not help now, but...

    brand new 150mm macro lens for Nikon for $729

    The Canon 180mm can be had, used, for 1k.


    The 105mm is a good lens that will give you quite usable service. Use it for a year. Then ask yourself if you want the longer lens.


    As far as 'moving away from the central area'...if what you mean is that lenses are sharpest in the center and get fuzzier towards the edges, then yes...they all do that somewhat. Macro lenses are specifically designed to minimize this with a 'flat field' design. A good macro lens strives for excellent corner-to-corner sharpness.

    A good portrait lens, on the other hand, often wants to be a little soft towards the corners.



  • << <i>I use a 105mm Nikon.
    Make sure it is a MACRO type.
    Won't do you any good if it has to be three feet away.
    image >>



    it says macro, and costs enough.

    (I have a 75-300 alleged macro: min focus distance 4.5 feet)

    ==========
    Additional Information about Nikon Telephoto 105mm f/2.8 Micro AIS Macro Manual Focus Lens
    Product Description
    Telephoto 105mm f/2.8 Micro AIS Macro Manual Focus Lens.

    Features
    Focus Adjustment Manual Focus
    Zoom Adjustment Fixed Focal Length Lens


    Details
    Filter Size 52 mm
    Aperture
    Minimum Focus Range 16.08 in
    Magnification Telephoto (65 to 600mm)
    View Angle 23 degrees
    Groups/Elements 10 Elements in 9 Groups
    Diameter 2.6 in
    Length 3.6 in
    Weight 18.24 oz
    MPN 1455

    should be OK ( the 60 works well to within 1/2 of minimum focus distance)
    WILL WORK FOR CENTS, QUARTERS, HALVES, DOLLARS....

    1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
    imagemy eBay
  • adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    Unfortunately, it needs to say "focuses to 1X" or "1:1".

    Macro is an overused term that is slapped onto any lens that can accomplish a magnification of 0.25x. Most lenses can do that.

    What is this "x"? It is the ratio of the size of your subject to the size of the image on the sensor. 1:1 means that the image projected onto your camera sensor will be exactly the same size as the original. 0.25 means that the image projected onto your sensor will be one fourth of the original size.

    A full-frame 35mm sensor is 24 by 36mm. A typical digital camera sensor smaller than this.

    Some macro lenses only focus as close as "1:2" or 0.5x. This is okay and will work for most coin photos. But not as good as a 1:1 model.

    The 70-300 long zoom lenses that say 'macro' are a joke as far as macro goes. Those lenses are really only suitable for outdoor direct sunlight photography in my opinion.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes.

    I'm using a 105/4 manual focus Micro Nikkor for almost everything.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Nikon ED 70-180mm Macro is excellent for coin work. Unfortunately, I don't think it is made anymore. It was an expensive lens and probably remains so on the used market.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The Nikon ED 70-180mm Macro is excellent for coin work. Unfortunately, I don't think it is made anymore. It was an expensive lens and probably remains so on the used market. >>



    Hard to find that one. I believe that it is a 1:2 also.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have 2 105's that I have not used since I got a 180 macro.
    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • yeah that's what I mean - I saw a planar lens for med format camera systems; I wasnt sure how long I'd be looking-

    and I'm tired of struggling.

    the Sigma looks interesting-
    my local camera guy wasnt looking beyond Tamron.

    I'm thru spending money for now- coins , gear, the works.
    (been spending like I really had it)
    WILL WORK FOR CENTS, QUARTERS, HALVES, DOLLARS....

    1879-O{Rev}: 1st coin of my "secret set"
    imagemy eBay
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>The Nikon ED 70-180mm Macro is excellent for coin work. Unfortunately, I don't think it is made anymore. It was an expensive lens and probably remains so on the used market. >>



    Hard to find that one. I believe that it is a 1:2 also. >>



    It is a f4.5-5.6.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    1:2 in terms of magnification. (half life size on the detector)
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 70-180 is 1:1.3 at 180mm. Linky
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,518 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Nikon 70-180 Macro is expensive. I found only one listed on eBay and it had a BIN of $1999. That is more than it cost originally.

    It can be used with both film and digital Nikon cameras.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    I ain't spending 2k on it.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file