Home U.S. Coin Forum

Bought a couple of neat things at the B&M yesterday....

guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,283 ✭✭✭

Was looking through some new purchases my local B&M dealer bought at the ATL show and brought these home yesterday along with a nice VF 1861 Seated Quarter and 17-S Rev. Walking Liberty Half.

Cool die break on the Rev of this 58-D Quarter.....
image
image


Some kind of MPD on this 58-O Seated Half......
image


@ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.

Comments

  • That's a pretty nice die break!
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,458 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I call foul.

    Where's the rest of that seated coin ?
  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,283 ✭✭✭

    Didn't want to show the rest 'cuz I knew I would get flamed for the rim issue.....but here she is.


    image
    image

    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • zeebobzeebob Posts: 2,825
    Rim ding or not, I like the half dollar. Neat piece!
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,458 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks image

    I like that , too. And dings are part of commerce.
  • phehpheh Posts: 1,588
    1858-O looks sort of clashed as opposed to MPD. Is the reverse rotated at all?
  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,283 ✭✭✭


    << <i>1858-O looks sort of clashed as opposed to MPD. Is the reverse rotated at all? >>




    The reverse is probably rotated less than 5 degrees clockwise. What do you think it is clashed with?

    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • the Seated Half looks like it was really well struck. Nice original look! image
  • JMWJMW Posts: 497
    I would agree with the group on the half, nothing to apologize for there.
  • Hello,
    I don't believe that the 1858-O is a misplaced digit because if you look at the top of the "8" that is supposedly in the rim, it is nearly the same height as the rest of dentils. I think that the center of the "8" is actually a gouge in the coin, as that area would have been removed with the making of the rim. When that gouge was received is when the metal was forced upwards to make the rim section seem a little higher than the other internodes of the dentils. Also, this supposed "8" seems a little smaller than the 8's that were used for the half dollars. Misplaced digits are relatively common below the dates of half dollars though. The die engravers would use digits close to the rim to determine the hardness of the die before they began to make them; sometimes the digits wouldn't get covered up by the dentils upon completion of the die. Sorry for the bad news of my opinion, but it's still a beautiful coin.
    Jesse.
    imageimageimage

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file