Home U.S. Coin Forum

Why should Luster be that important?

DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭✭✭
Below are five of my nicest Morgans that I have purchased over the years at various coin shows (mostly raw).

Technically, they are just about flawless. I grade them ms65. However, they are all lacking in luster.

PQ original toning, pristine coin, yet low on the luster scale.

I am hesitant to send these in for grading (US TPG's) as they'll most likely only get ms64.

Here in Canada (at ICCS), I know they would grade ms65, (1891-o ms64) but I'm doubtful with the US TPG's because they put more emphasis on luster.

However, I love this type of coin and will always be a willing purchaser of them.

Would you rather own this type of coin or would you rather have a coin with booming luster but with more hits on the surfaces.

1878
image

1878-cc
image

1890
image

1891-o
image

1898-o
image
"Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)

Comments

  • I want one with a happy median of luster, no marks, eye appeal, and just plain good looks.
  • FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think everyone has different tastes.
    I like your coins. But I loooooove luster. image
  • 123cents123cents Posts: 7,178 ✭✭✭
    Luster is important because it shows the preservation of the original skin of the coin.
    image
  • Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,274 ✭✭✭
    Give me luster, the lack of luster indicates the coin surface is damaged (toning is damage).
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • mommam17mommam17 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭
    I`ll take the booming luster with more hits. Lack of luster means the coin is not for me.
  • MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    Luster is often the first thing that you notice about a coin from a distance.

    It is also often indicative of a coin's overall grade as well.

    But in the end it is up to each of us to place a subjective value to good luster, and what's right for one person isn't necessarily right for another.

    Respectfully...Mike
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Toning affects luster.
  • DoogyDoogy Posts: 4,508


    Frankly, my experience with ICCS versus the US TPGs has been the opposite.

    I've had ICCS MS64 Morgans and Peace dollars that have been cracked out (or slit out, as it were) and re-graded at both PCGS and NGC at MS66. Of the 14 Morgan and Peace dollars i've owned that were ICCS, all but one were upgraded at PCGS (8 out of nine) while the remaining were all upgraded at NGC.
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Luster is what gives a coin pizzazz and original character.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Give me luster, the lack of luster indicates the coin surface is damaged (toning is damage). >>



    ricko's alter identity?image
    Many happy BST transactions
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Patrick Henry said......"Give me luster, or give me death".
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    strong luster means a crisp strike.
    weak luster with strong detail usually means something has been done to the coin such as a dip.
    weak luster on a coin toned like yours tells me that the coins were dipped and have retoned.
    the tone is probably the result of imcomplete rinsing after the dip and storage in an environment that contains some type of contaminant.
    it is possible to have coins with strong luster and attractive tone, although given enough time the luster will be affected.

    PCGS more than the other major grading services tends to place a premium on luster.
    PCGS is correct in doing so.

    my name is Al and i have not had any Koolaid this evening.image
  • WalmannWalmann Posts: 2,806
    "I have lustered in my heart."


  • << <i>Give me luster, the lack of luster indicates the coin surface is damaged (toning is damage). >>



    I have a question. If toning is damage, and luster is a prime component in a grade, why do toned coins get very high grades?
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>"I have lustered in my heart." >>

    If you get this you're over 45.
    Lance.
  • thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it ain't got luster, it just won't pass muster!



    << <i>

    << <i>"I have lustered in my heart." >>

    If you get this you're over 45.
    Lance. >>

    image

    Not tellin' my age, but unfortunately, I'll admit to having had a few of Jimmy's heart stirrings over the years too.
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,187 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, but did you smite a rabbit with a canoe paddle?
  • thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Yes, but did you smite a rabbit with a canoe paddle? >>



    No, but only because I've lacked the opportunity; I've never seen a rabbit swimming that close to my canoe! image
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,182 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good old Jimmy Carter.

    He lusted in his heart, he fought off a threatening rabbit with a canoe paddle, he put his darling little daughter Amy into Washington D.C. Public Schools when he first took up residence in the White House and if I recall I believe he publicly stated that "America's best days are over" while in office. He also was paralyzed over the Iranian Hostage Crisis, unable to act to rescue the hostages [particularly after the helicopter crash in the desert].

    What I remember most about his administration is his brother Billy and "Billy Berr".

    With respect to luster, some of my favorite coins are in a set of toned MS silver Roosies that I picked up a couple of years ago. Toning has definitely subdued the luster on some of these coins; however there are about 8-10 coins that have beautiful rainbow toning and blazing luster. Under good lighting the luster just booms off of these coins. Definitely some of the most beautiful coins that I have.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,960 ✭✭✭
    I would like a happy median. Toning that you can see through with booming luster underneath.
  • renomedphysrenomedphys Posts: 3,641 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great toning is great, but luster is the SHIZZAAAYYYYY!
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Actually, I need both luster and color to get excited about a Morgan.....
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,000 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At least 2 of the 4 coins look like slam dunk MS-65's to me.

    The strike on the other 2 look a bit weak.
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,000 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Why should luster be that important?

    Well it is not important if strike and mark-free surfaces are not present.

    But to have a combination of luster and toning is the most awesome when strike and surfaces are superior as well.
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Those are nice coins indeed but I would hesitate to grade them without seeing the reverses. I doubt the 1890 would grade a ms65.
    In my opinion they do lack luster and that is the first thing I look for when viewing a coin especially the morgan series.
    Positive:
    BST Transactions: DonnyJf, MrOrganic, Justanothercoinaddict, Fivecents, Slq, Jdimmick,
    Robb, Tee135, Ibzman350, Mercfan, Outhaul, Erickso1, Cugamongacoins, Indiananationals, Wayne Herndon

    Negative BST Transactions:
  • DropdaflagDropdaflag Posts: 807 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>strong luster means a crisp strike.
    weak luster with strong detail usually means something has been done to the coin such as a dip.
    weak luster on a coin toned like yours tells me that the coins were dipped and have retoned.
    the tone is probably the result of imcomplete rinsing after the dip and storage in an environment that contains some type of contaminant.
    it is possible to have coins with strong luster and attractive tone, although given enough time the luster will be affected.

    PCGS more than the other major grading services tends to place a premium on luster.
    PCGS is correct in doing so.

    my name is Al and i have not had any Koolaid this evening.image >>



    You drank it all this mourning!image
  • mumumumu Posts: 1,840
    I love the look of toned luster. Red toned luster especially has a great look to it. Anyone who thinks toning is "damage" is crazy. Plenty of 68 toned pieces out there, are those damaged? What damage occurred exactly to a coin that toned after sitting in a bag undisturbed for decades? Is a rainbow damaged air?
  • This content has been removed.
  • garsmithgarsmith Posts: 5,894 ✭✭
    << Why should Luster be that important? >>

    For the same reason cut is important in diamonds
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ah, the good humor man made it here...& I'm not to blame.
    I think you should send the coins in and take a chance. Until the coin is in hand, it's all just speculatin'.
  • "Why should Luster be that important?"

    Reminds me of Bill Cosby's schtick about the kid who asked "Why is there air"?
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭

    I like luster, but I'll generally take clean surfaces, a strong strike, and originality over luster.




    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • AU58WALKERSAU58WALKERS Posts: 3,562


    << <i>"Why should Luster be that important?"

    Reminds me of Bill Cosby's schtick about the kid who asked "Why is there air"? >>



    To fill up basketballs.
    "Everyday above ground is a good day"

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file