A Poll - Which photo do you prefer

zeebob

olmanjon

I think the second pic looks more like what you generally see the coin looking like-IMHO
Olmanjon

STONE

I definitely like the first image more but the second is likely closer to actual look!

OchoReales

#2 probably looks a heck of a lot more true to how the actual coin appears in hand! Maybe?

Gary

thisnamztaken

The first pic. looks like it was juiced quite a bit with some photo editing software like P.S., but the second shot reveals what looks like a couple of discoloration spots on the kangaroo. Overall, #2 is more eye-appealing to me and since I'm guessing that #2 most accurately portrays what the coin looks like in hand, I voted for that one.

coinkat

2

onejinx

I went with #3. The first really shows the red. And the second shows the coin as it should be.

wybrit

I like #2 best, but have decided that it is sometimes necessary to shoot the coins two different ways to show the relief and the fields.

ajaan

That coin is to die for. I get sick looking at it, I want it so much.

WWW

I like both of them. That is a very nice coin.

mnemtsas2

The second one. Unless your coin is unlike almost every other untoned proof I've ever seen then the first one is not the real colour.

SYRACUSIAN

<< <i>That coin is to die for. I get sick looking at it, I want it so much. >>




In the beginning I thought it was the 1963 that Jeremy sold last week. Then I saw that it was a 1958.

TwoKopeiki

First one positioned to show-off luster, the second one is a more natural shot. I would use both images if I were to sell a coin like this.

coinpictures

#1 looks unnatural, IMO. Depspite it being in a PCGS slab, I would be concerned that the coin had been recolored at some point.