Options
Question on Grading of Patterns
DeepSix
Posts: 78 ✭
For grading purposes, are all patterns given a "PF" designation as opposed to "MS"? My assumption (dangerous word, that one) is that since the dies weren't intended for circulation they are technically proofs, even though they might not have the mirrored fields that one typically associates with coins struck from proof dies.
0
Comments
No. However, most patterns that were struck for the purpose of milking a collector were made as proofs. In other words, most patterns are proofs. But certainly not all of them.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
To this day, I am still sorry that I sold that coin!
My Type Set
But semantically "proof" could be an appropriate description for presentation pieces. It works a bit different with banknotes and other such collectibles. But still I think the more precise terms are best - pattern can be a general term, but more precise are die trial, presentation piece and, well, I guess "pattern" is what's used for collector patterns since they're generally lower mintage and slightly more respectable than run of the mill NCLT.
My wantlist & references