Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Grade my already graded card? Opinions please (large scans)

It's in a non-psa holder, trying to get opinions. Thanks in advance!

image

image
image

Comments

  • Options
    jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,948 ✭✭✭✭
    I'd say 4 or 5
  • Options
    I'd go one lower.....I think a 3.5. Looks like you have a bend on the bottom left, and a dent on the top left as well.
  • Options
    ElemenopeoElemenopeo Posts: 2,577 ✭✭

    Looks a solid 5.

  • Options
    DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,220 ✭✭
    I'd say 4.5 or 5.
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • Options
    daddymcdaddymc Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭
    I'd guess somewhere between 3-4.
    Currently working on: Kurt Warner PSA 9 or 10

  • Options
    4.5 or a 5 does the winner get the card?
    image
  • Options
    samspopsamspop Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭
  • Options
    fattymacsfattymacs Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭
    4
  • Options
    EagleEyeKidEagleEyeKid Posts: 4,496 ✭✭
    PSA 4 Chaz
  • Options
    LittletweedLittletweed Posts: 623 ✭✭✭
    Looks like a 4 on a bad day, 4.5 on a normal day, 5 on a good day
    Matt

  • Options
    OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    4 - 4.5

    the bottom left on back..has a pressure bend
    and bottom right on the front corner is a little bent
  • Options
    I would say a 4.. on the back down below Season there is a bend or surface crease... also looks like some dents..

    Cory
    ----------------------
    Working on:
    Football
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
    1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
    1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)

    Baseball
    1938 Goudey (56.25%)
    1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
    1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
    1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
    1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
    1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
  • Options
    jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    Thanks, kind of what I was thinking too. The holder says 7 nm. Yikes
    image
  • Options
    OAKESY25OAKESY25 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭
    are you kidding??? a 7???
  • Options
    A 7!? Wow what was the name of the person grading and can I ship directly to him?
    image
  • Options
    Evidence of Trimming - right edge
  • Options
    JohnnyDJohnnyD Posts: 520 ✭✭
    What company gave that card a 7?
  • Options
    DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,220 ✭✭
    A S-E-V-E-N??? WOW! As a poster above me stated ... get me the name of that grader NOW! I am going to gather up every single card from the 70s on back that I have and ship it to him OVERNIGHT!!!!!
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • Options
    jeffcbayjeffcbay Posts: 8,948 ✭✭✭✭
    What is that, BCCG 7???
  • Options
    i would have guessed 5 max, 3 min.
  • Options
    chaz43chaz43 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭


    << <i>PSA 4 Chaz >>



    don't steal my thunder turkey. chaz
  • Options
    chaz43chaz43 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭
    I .... the real chaz.... would have graded it ....

    and the drum roll please...........


    PSA 5. chaz
  • Options
    NowPanicNowPanic Posts: 128 ✭✭
    That, in my opinion is a 4 (vg-ex) most days. A 5 if you are lucky.
  • Options
    hammeredhammered Posts: 2,671 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What company gave that card a 7? >>



    PRO or maybe GEM

    I know that's not a PSA holder....
  • Options
    nam812nam812 Posts: 10,541 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The card seems to have some registration problems too on the top where the yellow is bleeding a bit into the top border, and missing in parts of the word "selection".
  • Options
    Tedw9Tedw9 Posts: 1,424 ✭✭
    That card is junk and does not belong in a collection as nice as yours! Please forward it to me and I will dispose of it properly. image

    Seriously, if that is a crease on the back bottom left, I would go with a 4.




    +1 for a real Chaz sighting
    Looking for Carl Willey items.
  • Options
    jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭
    It's graded by "champ" grading. Their motto is something like "here at champ we use chimps to grade your card, chump".


    At least it didn't cost much.
    image
  • Options
    Isn't it a little ironic that the card only shows Ted's head and his head is nicely stored in that piece of plastic?
  • Options
    calaban7calaban7 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Evidence of Trimming - right edge >>



    Jim , I'm sorry , but I agree with this.

    I think if its not EOT , it will pull a 4.5.
    " In a time of universal deceit , telling the truth is a revolutionary act " --- George Orwell
  • Options
    calaban7calaban7 Posts: 3,002 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Isn't it a little ironic that the card only shows Ted's head and his head is nicely stored in that piece of plastic? >>



    Sick but image.
    " In a time of universal deceit , telling the truth is a revolutionary act " --- George Orwell
  • Options
    jimq112jimq112 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Evidence of Trimming - right edge >>



    Jim , I'm sorry , but I agree with this.

    I think if its not EOT , it will pull a 4.5. >>





    I agree too, and was waiting to hear EOT. Under high magnification you can see the difference in the edges. I think it's also EOT along the top egde




    image
Sign In or Register to comment.