Home U.S. Coin Forum

1943 Lincoln Cent New Purchase

Thoughts, Grades Just wanted to share, Getting to play with my new camera and new coin

image

image

Comments

  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    Hard to tell with the obverse picture. I would say 61, sticker. image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • tightbudgettightbudget Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭
    Looks reprocessed to me. Surfaces just don't seem "normal" to me.


  • << <i>Looks reprocessed to me. Surfaces just don't seem "normal" to me. >>



    I agree. That's one of the reprocessed pieces.
  • BobSavBobSav Posts: 937 ✭✭✭
    Pictures look washed out at least on my monitor. reverse pic is a little better.

    Can't grade with those photo's sorry.

    Bob
    Past transactions with:
    Lordmarcovan, WTCG, YogiBerraFan, Phoenin21, LindeDad, Coll3ctor, blue594, robkoll, Mike Dixon, BloodMan, Flakthat and others.
  • I need more practice with the camera. Not sure why the obverse didn't look the same as the reverse. It does in hand. Tri-pod will help too I bet,
    just did some quick shots with the camera in hand. and a 75 watt incandescent bulb
  • tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    It looks reprocessed to me too. Nice picture, average coin.
    Tom

  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Too much glare on the obverse. Play around with different lighting and angles. I have three lamps, one halogen and two incandescent I swap for fluorescent occasionally. Shiny copper is especially tough. Sometimes one light works best, sometime all three.

    Bright silver coins and, in this case, steel/zinc, are usually not as difficult as copper or toned coins. I often shoot 20 pix of each side, looking for the right focus, exposure and color.

    I would guess MS64 for your Lincoln, but better pix would help. Practice a lot and you will get really good (and picky). Mark's book is wonderfule and has some great tips.

    Lance.
  • Thanks for the heads up Lance about the lighting it is difficult to get it right sometimes But practice makes perfect
  • illini420illini420 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have no clue whether it's reprocessed or not, but assuming it's original, I would say 63-64 max. Just too many hits and I'm not seeing as much luster as there should be in a high graded steel cent. For reference, here's what a PQ PCGS 67 looks like:

    imageimage

    As far as the photos go, keep playing around with the camera and trying different lighting... practice makes perfect image
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭
    See the difference in the photos, comparing Ilini420's (which are very nice)? It's not just the size, which has some impact, but the resolution. Are you using any processing software? It looks like the sharpness is turned up too high in the OP's pix, making them too grainy and losing contrast.
    Lance.
  • Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    read your manual and find where you can set your white balance
    do that and youll get a truer color reproduction.
    or use some program to do color correction.
    image
  • Thanks guys this is going to go a long way to improving my picture taking ability with my coins, Yes I had to put the obverse into photoshop
    to even get it close. the reverse did not need anything it came out just like it looks in hand right off the camera.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file