BENCH ROOKIE - A little trim job?

Dboneesq · February 18, 2009 11:05AM

So whaddaya think? A trim job?

Mphilking · February 18, 2009 11:12AM

Doug do you mean the size of the card or the top border?
Mine looks about the same size, I think it's legit, I certainly hop it's legit.

EDITED: To mean I am confident mine is legitimate.

OAKESY25 · February 18, 2009 11:18AM

it is so hard to tell in scans.. the scan makes things appear wavy they may not actually be

however the borders do look thin

zep33 · February 18, 2009 11:18AM

lol that thing is cut all the way around - maybe he was trying to make a "mini" rare version

daddymc · February 18, 2009 11:19AM

Maybe it's the scan, but the bottom edge and left edge of the card look wavy to me and the bottom left corner doesn't look right.

mickeymantle24 · February 18, 2009 11:22AM

Card definitly looks trimmed on the sides...

divecchia · February 18, 2009 11:23AM

That card is definitely short in both directions...

Donato

zep33 · February 18, 2009 11:28AM

just look at the differences in the the borders between the edge and the photo. All 4 sides have less border

bman90278 · February 18, 2009 11:28AM

Doug, Here is a rotated and cropped pic that I hope helps and a increased sized one too.

brian

otwcards · February 18, 2009 11:53AM

<< <i>

>>

If any more of the card were whacked off, it would be a HNNY BENCH and RON TOMPK rookie card...

Dboneesq · February 18, 2009 12:28PM

I agree with the majority ... I have no prob with a side being short, but then, DAMMIT, the OPPOSITE side has to be much larger!! LOL BOTH sides look to be short ... even RANDY knows that can't be the case! TELL 'EM RANDY! HAHAHAHA

stown · February 18, 2009 1:13PM

<< <i>whacked off >>

Tee-hee

jim70mustang · February 18, 2009 2:19PM

OOOOps...

WinPitcher · February 18, 2009 5:31PM

The first one appears very short on the sides.

Steve

BENCH ROOKIE - A little trim job?

Comments