If the Coin A grades 55, Coin B should be a...
RYK
Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
If Coin A (from Dealer B 
) is a 55:
how would you grade Coin B:
]&sink)
]&sink)
) is a 55:
how would you grade Coin B:
0
Comments
One thing I'm certain of -- I don't like the big hit on coin B's face.
I bet you're going to announce coin B is certified as a 58. Right?
Lance.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
For southern gold, I have seen a wide range of coins in NGC AU-58 holders, many of which were no better than 55 at PCGS (and I have submitting experience which backs this up), and many were dipped out coins that were not worthy of consideration for anyone who even considers even an iota of originality in their purchasing decisions.
Perhaps we have reached the point where the TPG grade does not matter very much, as the price and grade for Coin B have significantly decoupled. People are buying the coin, not the holder.
<< <i>Perhaps we have reached the point where the TPG grade does not matter very much >>
It certainly seems to matter less than it did a year or two ago.
Barrytrot(2),Stupid,Savoyspecial,docq,ecoinquest, halfhunter,snman,Coll3ctor.
wondercoin. Blue594. internetjunky.
keepdachange. Scrapman1077.Ahrensdad, mrmom, mygrandeoso, blu62vette, Clackamas,giorgio11, adriana, cucamongacoin,
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
........coin b has less wear but more hits and less luster. i'd pass on both, myself.
<< <i>........coin b has less wear but more hits and less luster. i'd pass on both, myself.
I agree that B is a better strike.... but I would look again at the rev....... there seem's to be quite a bit of "rub" on that bird.
Barrytrot(2),Stupid,Savoyspecial,docq,ecoinquest, halfhunter,snman,Coll3ctor.
wondercoin. Blue594. internetjunky.
keepdachange. Scrapman1077.Ahrensdad, mrmom, mygrandeoso, blu62vette, Clackamas,giorgio11, adriana, cucamongacoin,
<< <i>For southern gold, I have seen a wide range of coins in NGC AU-58 holders, many of which were no better than 55 at PCGS (and I have submitting experience which backs this up), and many were dipped out coins that were not worthy of consideration for anyone who even considers even an iota of originality in their purchasing decisions.
Perhaps we have reached the point where the TPG grade does not matter very much, as the price and grade for Coin B have significantly decoupled. People are buying the coin, not the holder. >>
In my experience, overgraded AU gold in NGC holders is not limited to the southern mints. It may be true
for MS pieces as well, but I don't play in that sandbox so much...
<< <i>I disagree with the premise. To me, neither coin is "AU-anything" -- both are EF. >>
Wouldn't that just be striking weakness?
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>
<< <i>........coin b has less wear but more hits and less luster. i'd pass on both, myself.
I agree that B is a better strike.... but I would look again at the rev....... there seem's to be quite a bit of "rub" on that bird. >>
............that's one reason i would pass.
To give an honest, accurate answer, the pictures simply must be taken under similar lighting conditions.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution