Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

The 1854-S $20 Liberty

RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
I have always wanted to own one of these and this week was able to add one to my collection. It is not an exceptionally rare piece, but it is challenging to find one that was honestly circulated and also was not a salvage coin from the Yankee Blade hoard or the SS Central America. I believe that it is an important coin for the reason that it was the first $20 Liberty gold coin issued by the San Francisco Mint (which opened for operation that year). While the 1854-S QE and HE are nearly impossible and impossible to acquire, respectively, the 1854-S $10 is quite common and the 1854-S gold dollar is somewhat scarce, rounding out the 1854-S gold coin issues.

The PCGS pop report shows a total pop of 139 coins, trailing only the 1861-S Pacquet reverse and the 1866-S NM as the third scarcest SF $20 Lib. The grades range up to MS-65, but as indicated, many of the higher grade pieces have a matte surface from seawater exposure. There are a number of salvage pieces that are probably no-grades, so pop reports probably underestimate the total number of these available.

image

Comments

  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,019 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice coin! Congrats.
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,130 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A keeper.

    What did PCGS grade it?

    It looks to be a VF-35 possibly a EF/XF-40 to me.
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • CoinRaritiesOnlineCoinRaritiesOnline Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭✭
    Congrats on a cool coin, RYK. You are correct in your analysis of the 1854-S. There are a number of "seawater unc's" out there -- some of which have slipped into holders.

    We have a customer who has been avidly looking for an uncirculated 1854-S that was NOT a seawater unc. We participated in every major auction in the last 15 years searching for such a coin. It wasn't a matter of price -- he would pay whatever it took, but he didn't want one of those darn seawater uncs.

    We finally found one for him jsut a few months ago. A marvelous coin, and absolutely not for the sea.

    The 1854-S is a toughie, and few realize it.
  • RyGuyRyGuy Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭
    RYK,

    Threads like these are making me want to plunge into gold in the near future. Great looking coin, love the circulated look of gold.

    Ryan
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great Coin! I completely agree with the historical significance remarks, as these were made at the new mint from California gold mined during the Gold Rush.

    This issue is interesting in that uncirculated examples (mostly sea salvaged) are more available than typical circulated XF examples. This is mostly explained by the low mintage figure of 141,468, which is very low for S-mint double eagles. Many examples show significant die cracks on the reverse.

    Anyone else have an example?

  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    I call that an honest coin. It is natural, difficult to find, and has a nice look. Congratulations on the purchase, and regardless of what the TPGs put on the slab, it would give me great pleasure to place a sticker on that coin. image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats! image
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    i also the like the coin. i think san fran has an exciting history during
    the 1850s.
  • adamlaneusadamlaneus Posts: 6,969 ✭✭✭
    *WANT*


    So, do you ever get tired of your collection? What is your turnover rate. How long must we wait? Crab. Crab. Crab. Whine. Whine. Whine.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for the comments, guys. The coin was graded XF-40 by NGC. Doug thought it was a 45. It has a rich, natural patina that masks the underlying luster.

    Oreville, I do not know what PCGS grades it and do not plan to find out. I think that $20 Libs look nice in NGC holders and have no reason to cross it out.
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Congrats,

    your collection is becoming well rounded with a depth of meaning behind most of what you own.

    I am envious. image
  • Great coin!
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>*WANT*


    So, do you ever get tired of your collection? What is your turnover rate. How long must we wait? Crab. Crab. Crab. Whine. Whine. Whine. >>


    I guess you missed the coins-for-kitchen addition swap during the fall of 2007.

    Sure, I turn things over. I will put your name next to this one on the spreadsheet if I ever decide to move it out. image
  • First one I have ever seen not from the SS shipwreak. Very nice
    image
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Sure, I turn things over. I will put your name next to this one on the spreadsheet if I ever decide to move it out. image >>




    Please put my name next to the Eliasberg 1881-S half-eagle in your spreadsheetimage
  • lunytune2lunytune2 Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭
    I love gold .. wish I could afford more.
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,130 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ryk:


    You said:



    << <i> Oreville, I do not know what PCGS grades it and do not plan to find out. I think that $20 Libs look nice in NGC holders and have no reason to cross it out. >>



    The only reason I assumed it was graded by PCGS was that you cited the PCGS pop count but never mentioned the NGC pop count, so one would assume that it was in a PCGS holder.

    It does not look like a XF-45 to me. I can go along with the 35/40 grade range. Just a tad too much wear for a 45 on the high points. Likeable crusty coin and as I said earlier, a keeper.
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    CONGRATS...

    40 seems fair and I can see the reasoning behind a 45

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • robkoolrobkool Posts: 5,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for sharing... I sure would love to own one. I would just be happy with any type 1 Liberty $20 gold in grades of XF or higher.
  • So you're the one who snagged that off of Doug Winter's website? I love the original "European" look of the coin as for the grade I could see it making 45 if the issue was notorius for a weak strike otherwise I would say it looks more like a 40.
  • DaveGDaveG Posts: 3,535
    One thing about the Type I double eagles (especially those from San Francisco) is that they were melted in very large numbers.

    Many of these coins were exported to Europe soon after they were minted, where they were melted and frequently turned into sovereigns and 20 Franc pieces.

    The coins that stayed in California actually circulated, as the Californians wouldn't use paper money (not even Greenbacks). In later years, like the 1880s and 1890s, when the coins were a bit worn from circulation (say down to VF or even XF), the coins were returned to the Mints, where they were melted and turned into shiny, new double eagles.

    When you think about it, it's a minor miracle that we have as many of these coins today as we do.

    Check out the Southern Gold Society

  • Nice coin!

    I understand wanting a first year $20 gold from a particular mint. Took me quite a while to find a natural skinned 1906-D that I liked. Only $20 gold that took me longer to find was a natural skinned New Orleans $20 gold.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭✭
    you can see the luster around the stars, my first thought was 45.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The lustre and just the overall appearance of the fields is a compelling argument for a 45

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great coin! The "S" mint mark looks a little odd. Does it actually go into the eagle?
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • BloodManBloodMan Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Great coin! The "S" mint mark looks a little odd. Does it actually go into the eagle? >>



    This is usual for the issue. On most 1854 S-mint double eagles, the mintmark touches the tail feathers and is often lightly struck.

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin was recently crossed to PCGS at the same level, and they were kind enough to take a photo.

    image

    The original photo from DWN:

    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • jmbjmb Posts: 595 ✭✭✭
    Great look to that DE.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Why did you bother to cross this beauty? >>


    I have gone all PCGS for my core collection.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,654 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice!
    TD
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Absolutely beautiful coin! The history behind it makes it even more exciting. That's the best part about collecting is the coins past lives. Congrats! LOVE LOVE IT!!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file