Home› Sports Talk

Has Canseco been proven wrong yet ?

edmundfitzgeraldedmundfitzgerald Posts: 4,306 ✭✭
in Sports Talk
Apparently not.

Canseco said he couldn't believe Arod wasn't mentioned in the Mitchell Report. So far Canseco has not been proven wrong
on any accounts. Have I missed anything ?

Comments

  • jdip9jdip9 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭
    No, he's been right at every turn...if he wasn't so much of a clown, people would take him more seriously, though.
  • DboneesqDboneesq Posts: 18,219 ✭✭


    << <i>if he wasn't so much of a clown, people would take him more seriously, though. >>



    AGREE 100% ... and in the late 80s/early 90s I was a BIG fan of Cansecos!
    STAY HEALTHY!

    Doug

    Liquidating my collection for the 3rd and final time. Time for others to enjoy what I have enjoyed over the last several decades. Money could be put to better use.
  • alpemomoalpemomo Posts: 355 ✭
    actually he said Clemens was not on steroids and he said Clemens was the only guy in MLB not cheating on his wife... wrong and wrong - alledgedly
    "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind". - Gandhi
  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not a Canseco fan, but I did root for him to beat up Danny Bonaduce...
  • MeteoriteGuyMeteoriteGuy Posts: 7,140 ✭✭


    << <i>actually he said Clemens was not on steroids and he said Clemens was the only guy in MLB not cheating on his wife... wrong and wrong - alledgedly >>



    Correct. So I wonder, if anyone who thinks Canseco has not been proven wrong.....have you read either of his books?
    Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards.
    Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Sign In or Register to comment.