I can understand why you would ask the question, as I don't see a trace of wear, no do I see even a slight blemish, but where is the detail in the hair? I'd have to view another one like it to determine whether there was any more detail to be seen.
I really like the look of that coin no matter what grade it is.
Flat in the hair which could be either strike weakness or wear. I'd say strike weakness as the colour looks pretty good through there. I'd say a 63-65 coin.
Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.
From looking at the hundreds of large cents that I have... I would have to say that the crown jewels will wear before the hair... With that being said, I'll say it's strike weakness HOWEVER, I don't think it is as weak as some are pointing out...
I see no signs of wear, but I don't like it either. The surfaces seem dead with absolutely no lustre whatsoever. Maybe it looks different in hand, but it just looks "off" to me.
<< <i>I see no signs of wear, but I don't like it either. The surfaces seem dead with absolutely no lustre whatsoever. Maybe it looks different in hand, but it just looks "off" to me. >>
The lack of lustre bothers me too. I was going to say AU and cleaned. But after reading more of the posts, I would guess maybe MS-65, weak-strike (thus the lack of detail in the hair that made me think AU or even XF), but I'm thinking dipped because the luster seems missing (could be the photo too).
Second set of pictures is much better, in my opinion (sorry Don). The surfaces look much more natural and what I would expect from an UNC piece. Depending on whether the slight flattening in the hair is wear or not, I say either AU58 or 63BN.
Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his.
<< <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>
Ergf. I didn't even compare them side by side. You're right.
<< <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>
It's the same coin, if you look real hard you can see the marks under ONE in Ajaan's photo. There are also a few spots that match up.
Look at what appears to be a very kight hairline in the sellers picture bbetween ONE CENT. It does not appear on Ajaan's image- I guess it could be the angle, lighting or ?
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Comments
Nice coin, probably a 67
FOR SALE Items
I really like the look of that coin no matter what grade it is.
is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
looks to be a sweet coin
The Fireman...
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Zar's Ebay
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
<< <i>I see no signs of wear, but I don't like it either. The surfaces seem dead with absolutely no lustre whatsoever. Maybe it looks different in hand, but it just looks "off" to me. >>
The lack of lustre bothers me too. I was going to say AU and cleaned. But after reading more of the posts, I would guess maybe MS-65, weak-strike (thus the lack of detail in the hair that made me think AU or even XF), but I'm thinking dipped because the luster seems missing (could be the photo too).
Submit the coin and tell us what the results are.
The true look of the coin is somewhere between mine and his images.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors
Collector of:
Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
My Ebay
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>
Ergf. I didn't even compare them side by side. You're right.
1/2 Cents
U.S. Revenue Stamps
<< <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>
It's the same coin, if you look real hard you can see the marks under ONE in Ajaan's photo. There are also
a few spots that match up.
<< <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. >>
I wonder... look at the shading in the circled areas in the two photos:
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
eBay Store
DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders