Home› World & Ancient Coins Forum

AU50? AU55? AU58? MS61? MS63? MS70?

ajaanajaan Posts: 17,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
in World & Ancient Coins Forum
image

DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


Don

Comments

  • RickeRicke Posts: 677 ✭
    No. Yes. Maybe. No. No No.
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    Just at quick glance, I don't see any signs of wear... then again I haven't REALLY looked hard... BEAUTIFUL coin....
    www.GoASU.com
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    The Grading services could not agree, how are we supposed tooimage

    Nice coin, probably a 67
    My Medals collection

    FOR SALE Items
  • IloiloKanoIloiloKano Posts: 1,051
    I can understand why you would ask the question, as I don't see a trace of wear, no do I see even a slight blemish, but where is the detail in the hair? I'd have to view another one like it to determine whether there was any more detail to be seen.

    I really like the look of that coin no matter what grade it is.
    My US-PI One Centavo Circulation Strikes (1903-1944)
  • laurentyvanlaurentyvan Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin, was it imaged with camera or scanner?
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
    is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato
  • JoesMaNameJoesMaName Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭
    63-67 depending on the day
    looks to be a sweet coin

    ...
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Laurent, images with camera.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    submit the coinimage

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • IstilllikeZARcoinsIstilllikeZARcoins Posts: 812 ✭
    AU57









    image
    The meaning of life ? I don't know but I am sure that coins have something to do with it.

    Zar's Ebay
  • mnemtsas2mnemtsas2 Posts: 745 ✭✭✭
    Flat in the hair which could be either strike weakness or wear. I'd say strike weakness as the colour looks pretty good through there. I'd say a 63-65 coin.
    Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    From looking at the hundreds of large cents that I have... I would have to say that the crown jewels will wear before the hair... With that being said, I'll say it's strike weakness HOWEVER, I don't think it is as weak as some are pointing out...
    www.GoASU.com
  • coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    I see no signs of wear, but I don't like it either. The surfaces seem dead with absolutely no lustre whatsoever. Maybe it looks different in hand, but it just looks "off" to me.
    Numismotography

    1/2 Cents

    U.S. Revenue Stamps

    image
  • zeebobzeebob Posts: 2,825 ✭


    << <i>I see no signs of wear, but I don't like it either. The surfaces seem dead with absolutely no lustre whatsoever. Maybe it looks different in hand, but it just looks "off" to me. >>



    The lack of lustre bothers me too. I was going to say AU and cleaned. But after reading more of the posts, I would guess maybe MS-65, weak-strike (thus the lack of detail in the hair that made me think AU or even XF), but I'm thinking dipped because the luster seems missing (could be the photo too).

    Submit the coin and tell us what the results are.
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here are the seller's images:

    image
    image

    The true look of the coin is somewhere between mine and his images.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • 1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭✭
    63red-brown
    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭
    Second set of pictures is much better, in my opinion (sorry Don). The surfaces look much more natural and what I would expect from an UNC piece. Depending on whether the slight flattening in the hair is wear or not, I say either AU58 or 63BN.
    Numismotography

    1/2 Cents

    U.S. Revenue Stamps

    image
  • ormandhormandh Posts: 3,111 ✭✭✭
    Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his.
    Numismasource ebay store
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just watched Witness For the Prosecution...



    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • coinpicturescoinpictures Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>



    Ergf. I didn't even compare them side by side. You're right.
    Numismotography

    1/2 Cents

    U.S. Revenue Stamps

    image
  • BSBS Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. Look at the rims at the top. Your image shows no hits at all; his image shows some hits. His pics has more details than yours. Put a side by side view of the obverses and I would be willing to bet that you will see a difference in detail. Yours is a soft strike compared to his. >>

    It's the same coin, if you look real hard you can see the marks under ONE in Ajaan's photo. There are also
    a few spots that match up.
  • ormandhormandh Posts: 3,111 ✭✭✭
    I can see where you are coming from. But, I would have to see a different angle to fully agree.
    Numismasource ebay store
  • mrpotatoheaddmrpotatoheadd Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Not the same coin, whatsoever. >>

    I wonder... look at the shading in the circled areas in the two photos:

    image
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Look at what appears to be a very kight hairline in the sellers picture bbetween ONE CENT. It does not appear on Ajaan's image- I guess it could be the angle, lighting or ?

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They are most definately the same coin.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • ormandhormandh Posts: 3,111 ✭✭✭
    Are you using a flash to image this?
    Numismasource ebay store
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,613 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The only light I used to image the coin was sunlight. I admit, I imaged it quickly and it isn't the greatest image.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • ormandhormandh Posts: 3,111 ✭✭✭
    That is why the image looks washed out and lots of the details were distorted.
    Numismasource ebay store
  • spinaker2000spinaker2000 Posts: 4,329 ✭
    Hey Don, try some more pics!! image
    Terry

    eBay Store

    DPOTD Jan 2005, Meet the Darksiders
  • ProofCentsProofCents Posts: 1,656
    AU58 to MS61 due mostly to strike
Sign In or Register to comment.