so are you saying that the possible rating of a set changes if a card in a set receives a grade higher than it ever had in the past. so if the psa 10 was given for the first time for a card, the possible rating goes up?
Yep, it all depends on what the highest grade ever given per card in the set. One of the reasone 1 of 1 10's are so coveted even in modern sets, as they make everyone else's ratings dip as soon as they hit.
Currently completing the following registry sets: Cardinal HOF's, 1961 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, 1980 Pittsburgh Pirates Team, Bill Mazeroski Master & Basic Sets, Roberto Clemente Master & Basic Sets, Willie Stargell Master & Basic Sets and Terry Bradshaw Basic Set
<< <i>Yep, it all depends on what the highest grade ever given per card in the set. One of the reasone 1 of 1 10's are so coveted even in modern sets, as they make everyone else's ratings dip as soon as they hit. >>
but i thought 1 of 1 are not part of master sets. i thought you cannot list cards that have less than 5 in existance.
<< <i>Yep, it all depends on what the highest grade ever given per card in the set. One of the reasone 1 of 1 10's are so coveted even in modern sets, as they make everyone else's ratings dip as soon as they hit. >>
but i thought 1 of 1 are not part of master sets. i thought you cannot list cards that have less than 5 in existance. >>
He is referring to cards that, despite being produced in quantity, have only one example ever graded at the PSA 10 GEM MINT level.
I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
Only eBay sellers consider a pop 1 PSA 10 of say 1982 Topps a 1 of 1. To everyone else it is a 1 in 10,000,000 or so.
Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards. Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Comments
5 card set equal weight.
#1 psa 9
#2 psa 10
#3 psa 10
#4 psa 9
#5 psa 10
above represents highest grade given for the #
highest possible ( current finest possible set rating) (9+10+10+9+10=48 48/5=9.6
9.6 highest possible set rating
SKY
so are you saying that the possible rating of a set changes if a card in a set receives a grade higher than it ever had in the past. so if the psa 10 was given for the first time for a card, the possible rating goes up?
<< <i>Yep, it all depends on what the highest grade ever given per card in the set. One of the reasone 1 of 1 10's are so coveted even in modern sets, as they make everyone else's ratings dip as soon as they hit. >>
but i thought 1 of 1 are not part of master sets. i thought you cannot list cards that have less than 5 in existance.
<< <i>
<< <i>Yep, it all depends on what the highest grade ever given per card in the set. One of the reasone 1 of 1 10's are so coveted even in modern sets, as they make everyone else's ratings dip as soon as they hit. >>
but i thought 1 of 1 are not part of master sets. i thought you cannot list cards that have less than 5 in existance. >>
He is referring to cards that, despite being produced in quantity, have only one example ever graded at the PSA 10 GEM MINT level.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
<< <i>Only eBay sellers consider a pop 1 PSA 10 of say 1982 Topps a 1 of 1. To everyone else it is a 1 in 10,000,000 or so. >>
if there 10 million of a card in mint condition what is the incentive to get it graded unless you need in your psa registry.
that generally it will resale for more than grading fees making it a profitable card
people want it for their PSA sets
some people just like owning PSA 10's of anything
it's easier to get $5 for a common 1982 common PSA 10 than 5 cents ungraded on ebay