Should I submit these? 1981 Golf

What do you guys think? Should these go in with my January special sub?
These are the best from my packs from last years group rip.

Thanks,
Mike
These are the best from my packs from last years group rip.

Thanks,
Mike
------
stupid print dots
0
Comments
----------------------
Working on:
Football
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (99.81%)
1976 Topps PSA 9+ (36.36%)
1977 Topps PSA 9+ (100%)
Baseball
1938 Goudey (56.25%)
1951 Topps Redbacks PSA 8 (100%)
1952 Bowman PSA 7+ (63.10%)
1953 Topps PSA 5+ (91.24%)
1973 Topps PSA 8+ (70.76%)
1985 Fleer PSA 10 (54.85%)
<< <i>I wouldn't submit any of those until I get mine back from PSA and sold on eBay. After that, I would say yes to Jacobsen and the Floyd. The Trwvino is only a 9 at best which makes it almost worthless. The Gilder is probably a 10 but you couldn't get more than $15 for it on eBay. If they are for a registry set, I would sub them all. >>
Right on. Cards with that centering are never graded a 10 by PSA.
<< <i>Poobotts my man, I am overly familiar with 81 Donruss Golf and I know that they are typically OC and PSA gives a little leeway for centering on this set. I don't need a link. My underlying point was that a PSA 9 is worthless so your only looking for PSA 10's. To improve your chances of getting a PSA 10, 55/45 centering or better would be much safer than risking submitting a card that is 60/40. Have a good night and happy collecting. >>
Wow. So the chances that a well centered card will end up in a PSA 10 holder are superior to the chances that an off centered card will end up in a PSA holder?
Does the same hold true for corners? That is, will a card with four sharp corners end up in a PSA 10 holder more often than a card with three sharp corners?
<< <i>Wow. So the chances that a well centered card will end up in a PSA 10 holder are superior to the chances that an off centered card will end up in a PSA holder? >>
Ummmm, YES. Feel free to read PSA's grading standards regarding "eye appeal". Have a nice night and happy collecting.
Instead of beauty is in the eye of the beholder, its PSA 10's are in the eye of he who holders.
<< <i>
<< <i>Wow. So the chances that a well centered card will end up in a PSA 10 holder are superior to the chances that an off centered card will end up in a PSA holder? >>
Ummmm, YES. Feel free to read PSA's grading standards regarding "eye appeal". Have a nice night and happy collecting. >>
James
<< <i>I would only grade the Peter Jacobsen and the Bob Gider.
James >>
Same here.
"Molon Labe"
<< <i>Honestly I wouldn't grade any. I mean what's the market for a PSA 10 Bob Gilder? >>
Basically what I said earlier but no one listened. The Gilder in a 10 holder only sells for about $15. After eBay, Paypal and shipping fees, you make about a buck or two. That is assuming it grades a 10. A PSA 9 is best used as a coaster.
Mike
------
stupid print dots
>
Successful transactions on the BST boards with rtimmer, coincoins, gerard, tincup, tjm965, MMR, mission16, dirtygoldman, AUandAG, deadmunny, thedutymon, leadoff4, Kid4HOF03, BRI2327, colebear, mcholke, rpcolettrane, rockdjrw, publius, quik, kalinefan, Allen, JackWESQ, CON40, Griffeyfan2430, blue227, Tiggs2012, ndleo, CDsNuts, ve3rules, doh, MurphDawg, tennessebanker, and gene1978.
Woo-wooo
------
stupid print dots
<< <i>For what it's worth, I ended up subbing the Jacobsen. I am now the proud owner of the 80th PSA 1981 Donruss Golf #26 in existence!
Woo-wooo >>
The 80th what? 9, 10, raspberry, spare tire, etc......
woo woo
------
stupid print dots
------
stupid print dots
BTW, that was a serious offer.
------
stupid print dots