Revealing Cert#s on the Set Registry. Good idea?

Hey Guys,
Please, forgive me for now posting this question on the Registry Board, but this particular forum is second to none and I wanted an informed and expeditious opinion. That said, I've yet to apply for a spot on the registry, but was considering doing so later this year once I had amassed a few more cards from my beloved '15 CJ set. There seem to be a number of fraudulent auctions out there that feature stolen/copied images from the registry and elsewhere. Would it be a good idea to redact the cert# from scanned cards, or would it be wise to reveal the numbers for one reason or another? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Scout
Please, forgive me for now posting this question on the Registry Board, but this particular forum is second to none and I wanted an informed and expeditious opinion. That said, I've yet to apply for a spot on the registry, but was considering doing so later this year once I had amassed a few more cards from my beloved '15 CJ set. There seem to be a number of fraudulent auctions out there that feature stolen/copied images from the registry and elsewhere. Would it be a good idea to redact the cert# from scanned cards, or would it be wise to reveal the numbers for one reason or another? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Scout
Always looking for 1915 Cracker Jacks in a uniform PSA 3 (NQ)
psacard.com/psasetregistry/publishedset.aspx?s=223023&ac=1
psacard.com/psasetregistry/publishedset.aspx?s=223023&ac=1
0
Comments
There really doesn't seem to be a downside to getting rid of the cert number on your scanned photos except the extra time it takes to hide or erase it. But I wonder if some people like to keep the cert number on the scan for insurance reporting purposes?
Brian
You can always send the cert by email if the buyer/bidder requests
Mike
Kirby Puckett Master Set
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
<< <i>I don't think it really matters if the 2-3% continue to white out their cert #'s as the other 98-97% does not. >>
While true; I don't want my buyers to go through the hassle of finding out their new purchase is in someone's registry set and it takes scans/emails to Gayle to get the cards out of said scammers set.
Kirby Puckett Master Set
Koufax Auction on eBay
<< <i>
<< <i>I don't think it really matters if the 2-3% continue to white out their cert #'s as the other 98-97% does not. >>
While true; I don't want my buyers to go through the hassle of finding out their new purchase is in someone's registry set and it takes scans/emails to Gayle to get the cards out of said scammers set. >>
The OP's question was on cards in the set registry already, however what you are suggesting can not be that common. I have about 5,000 PSA cards and have never submitted a card...so most of mine where purchased on eBay and while there have been times I could not enter the card, it was because of the Seller...not some random eBay fraudster.
Buyers can also test the cert. number for their set before they purchase it, one of the registry version 2 features, if this did happen to them in the past.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
True, it does not happen a lot. Most of the cards I sell, I sell to set builders and they let me know when the cert came up in another set because of the extra effort to get into their registry set. I think most registry guys understand its a necs evil but why not avoid the problem if you can.
To Von's point, I agree that if you sell vintage and high dollar cards that it is more valueable to check the cert than time wasted emailing PSA scans of the card to verify you own it. I sell a lot of $10-20 PSA 10 commons so my market is not worried about qualifiers or values so much because they can't get burned by more than $20.
Kirby Puckett Master Set