More help identifying ancients
I have aquired these ancients over the last few years and am having trouble identifying them. Any help would be appreciated or directions to help would be helpful too!
I have info on some but not sure if some of it is correct.
This is Roman about 21mm
Coin 1 obv
Coin 1 rev
This is Ancient middle east, possibly Kabul Afghanistan 850-970 A.D.?
Coin 2 obv
Coin 2 rev
This is Roman, possibly 100-300 A.D.?
Coin 3 obv
Coin 3 rev
I believe this is Roman
Coin 4 obv
Coin 4 rev
Roman as well
Coin 5 obv
Coin 5 rev
I believe this is Greek
Coin 6 obv
Coin 6 rev
Roman
Coin 7 obv
Coin 7 rev
I appreciate the help, I'm still trudging away at more, this area of collecting is so interesting
Thanks
I have info on some but not sure if some of it is correct.
This is Roman about 21mm
Coin 1 obv
Coin 1 rev
This is Ancient middle east, possibly Kabul Afghanistan 850-970 A.D.?
Coin 2 obv
Coin 2 rev
This is Roman, possibly 100-300 A.D.?
Coin 3 obv
Coin 3 rev
I believe this is Roman
Coin 4 obv
Coin 4 rev
Roman as well
Coin 5 obv
Coin 5 rev
I believe this is Greek
Coin 6 obv
Coin 6 rev
Roman
Coin 7 obv
Coin 7 rev
I appreciate the help, I'm still trudging away at more, this area of collecting is so interesting
Thanks
It's not the decisions we have to make in life that are hard, its when to make them....
- Dad
- Dad
0
Comments
#3- Roman provincial. This is probably a tetradrachm struck in one of the provinces.
#4- if that is Roman, it is also a provincial, since the inscriptions are in Greek. It is either ancient Greek or Roman provincial. Generally speaking, from the very small amount I know, ancient Greek coins tend to be struck on thicker flans than the Roman stuff that came later.
#5- another 4th century Roman.
#6- you might be right- it may be Greek. Then again, another Roman provincial is not out of the question, either. I don't really know, though I vaguely recognize the portrait on there.
#7- yep, definitely Roman, probably 4th century.
Sorry I haven't been able to add much that you didn't already know. I have a little bit of experience in these now, but am still a bit green at attribution, and it's hard with the later stuff when you can't read the legends. The 1st century stuff is usually a lot easier because the portraits were much more individualistic, so even if the legends are incomplete, you can ID them from the portrait. The 4th century stuff, on the other hand, had much more generic portraiture, and so it's harder to pin down to a specific emperor unless you can read the legends or identify a particular reverse design. (A lot of the reverse designs were generic, too.) These coins are probably identifiable, but not by me- I can confirm their general time period, loosely, but that's about it.
#3 is indeed a tetradrachm from Roman Egypt. The obverse legend reads (in Greek letters) AVT K P LIK GALLIENOS SEB - that's emperor Gallienus, circa 265 AD. These coins bear more precise dates, given as the regnal year of the emperor, on the reverse - but I can't make it out on yours. Similar to this one on Wildwinds.
#4: Greek, city of Pergamon, region of Mysia. Pseudo-autonomous, circa 40-60 AD. Example on Wildwinds.
#6: Yep, this one's Greek, too. The portrait is a turreted Tyche, goddess of fortune and luck, and a popular symbol on the coins of many cities. The name of the city (or the king) is written in Greek, sideways, on the reverse - rotate the coin 90 degrees to the I can read ...EVK...; my best guesses are either a coin of a city named Seleukia or a coin from one of the Seleukid kings of Syria.
Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"
Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice.
Coin #7 looks to be Constantius II as well with the two soldiers on the reverse with a legionary standard between. Mint looks to be Heraclea and Officina 1. The legend on the reverse reads GLORIA EXERCITUS, or "the glory of the army".
Mojo
-Jim Morrison-
Mr. Mojorizn
my blog:www.numistories.com
I appreciate it!
Ryan
- Dad