Home Sports Talk

2010 HOF Candidates

jaxxrjaxxr Posts: 1,258 ✭✭
Enough about Henderson and Rice, what about next year ?

For 2010, new first timers will include, Roberto Alomar, Barry Larkin, Edgar Martinez, and Fred McGriff.
Probably no sure-fire locks for first ballot entry, however all have some worthy features, and might eventually get in.

Edgar Martinez is the most interesting possibility. A fine hitter, with some impressive stats indeed, several league leading seasons in the popular triple crown batting numbers, give him some lasting fame, as well.
Does a DH belong in the HOF ? Since part time performers like closers are now felt to be potential HOFers, do DHs deserve the same consideration ?
Manny Mota, Smokey Burgess, and other pinch hitters, are never mentioned in HOF talk, should a full time pinch hitter be ?
Does a DH need to excell much more than a regular position player, probably yes, however the question is really, how much more ?

If Edgar had played in LA or NY, perhaps, his popularity would have been larger, and his HOF viability larger also. He will be the very first true DH, getting HOF consideration, and there really are no DH comparisons to try and use.

I am somewhat undecided as to how I might vote regarding Edgar.
Some comments and views from others would be appreciated.

image
This aint no party,... this aint no disco,.. this aint no fooling around.

Comments

  • baseballfanbaseballfan Posts: 5,458 ✭✭✭
    next year i think the hawk and maybe bert get in
    Fred

    collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.

    looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started

  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A very impressive freshman crop of players there..

    He was a malcontent but Alomar deserves to be in the HOF, McGriff and Larkin, too...Blyleven, too. I'd say Alomar, McGriff, Larkin,, Blyleven and Raines are all worthy of serious consideration and votes...

    Re Martinez: I have a problem voting first ballot for a guy who only played one way for the majority of his career...not saying I'd never consider it, but...


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.


  • << <i>A very impressive freshman crop of players there..

    He was a malcontent but Alomar deserves to be in the HOF, McGriff and Larkin, too...Blyleven, too. I'd say Alomar, McGriff, Larkin,, Blyleven and Raines are all worthy of serious consideration and votes...

    Re Martinez: I have a problem voting first ballot for a guy who only played one way for the majority of his career...not saying I'd never consider it, but... >>



    I would agree on pretty much all counts here Grote.

    What is going to end up happening is that Dawson will be voted in next year. Blyleven may possibly make it.

    Of the new comers Alomar has the greatest chance to make it next year on the first ballot. I think the others will end up being bantered about for a few years. Alomar has the ability, and a great playing reputation. His fielding reputation is probably greater than his actual fielding contribution, but that does not matter to the voters.
  • Of the new crop, Alomar has the best shot. McGriff would get my vote, 493 HR's is nothing to sneeze at and he was a good guy; not a steroids freakazoid, very very consistent RBI guy. if he had 7 more HR it wouldnt even be a question. which is just silly. he will get in eventually.

    next year the Hawk might get in.... and Blylevn too!
  • bman90278bman90278 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭
    I think the writers might make Alomar wait a year and maybe McGriff gets in one day?? It's hard to say. As people have said, the stats and standards have increased as compared to 10 or 15 years ago. Maybe it will allow a few players who should have already get in previous elections get in during the next year or two.

    Who is eligible for the first time in 2011?
  • gregmo32gregmo32 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭
    As an Orioles fan, I remember Jim Palmer commenting often about Alomar, "He is the best all around player I have seen."

    He is a definite HOFer, but will likely wait a year or two for entry.

    Larkin should make it eventually. Blyleven and Raines deserve it.

    Edgar will be interesting. Great hitter. If he had been a poor fielding first baseman 150 games a year, he would have done less to help his team than he did at DH and increased his chances of being inducted (which is, obviously, kind of dumb).
    I am buying and trading for RC's of Wilt Chamberlain, George Mikan, Bill Russell, Oscar Robertson, Jerry West, and Bob Cousy!
    Don't waste your time and fees listing on ebay before getting in touch me by PM or at gregmo32@aol.com !
  • aro13aro13 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭
    ~"Who is eligible for the first time in 2011?"~

    2011: Wilson Alvarez, Carlos Baerga, Jeff Bagwell, Bret Boone, Kevin Brown, Cal Eldred, John Franco, Juan Gonzalez, Marquis Grissom, Bobby Higginson, Charles Johnson, Al Leiter, Tino Martinez, Raul Mondesi, Jose Offerman, John Olerud, Rafael Palmeiro, Paul Quantrill, Steve Reed, Kirk Rueter, Rey Sanchez, Benito Santiago, B.J. Surhoff, Ugueth Urbina, Ismael Valdez, Larry Walker, Dan Wilson

    Bagwell and Walker head the class.


    For 2010 I would agree with Hoopster except I think Mcgriff is going to be on the outside looking in for while.


  • larryallen73larryallen73 Posts: 6,061 ✭✭✭
    I think the 2010 freshman are a lot of great players who may end up getting in during their first 5 years of eligibility but not sure any are first time hofers.

    For 2011... again, not sure there are any first timers. I can't believe Mondesi has been retired that long.
  • PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
    I was just looking at Barry Larkin's lifetime stats, and they were pretty damn impressive. Why he doesn't get the recognition he deserves is beyond me.
  • VitoCo1972VitoCo1972 Posts: 6,128 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I was just looking at Barry Larkin's lifetime stats, and they were pretty damn impressive. Why he doesn't get the recognition he deserves is beyond me. >>



    You got me. He played on some bad teams but he has 9 Silver Sluggers, 11 All Star Teams and an MVP Award and a WS Ring (1990). He's as big a lock as locks get.

    You had to see Alomar to appreciate him, be he's also a lock. That guy could get to any ball seemingly.

    Blyleven is in my opinion a hall of very good guy. Only 27 games over 500 in his career - never finishing in the top 2 in Cy Youngs.

    He has a nice career WHIP (1.19) and good K/BB (almost 3 to 1) but other guys have similar numbers to those. It's not like he suffered on a losing team fr his whole career like Carlton did for many years. He moved around and was in the playoffs 3 times.
  • bman90278bman90278 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭
    Rich Goosage had some interesting comments yesterday in our paper...I gotta find the article and post it.
  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's a shame Alomar's career tailed off so much at the end, or it would be a lock for him. Edgar was a terrific hitter in his prime, but the DH thing will stop him from getting in. McGriff will get in on an early ballot, maybe even the first year. As for the class of 2011, Bagwell gets in, and Palmeiro would've gotten in... Olerud another solid hitter, but he falls short.
  • McGriff is one of the most underrated players of all time and definitely of his generation. Quiet, consistent, good defensive, great power and a friendly human being. Another player who would be a lock for the hall if he had played for the Yankees, Red Sox or Dodgers.
  • PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
    Larkin was also a Gold Glove award winner three years in a row, 1994-96, and he was the first shortstop to post a 30-30 season.
    The remarkable story about Larkin, who was born and raised in Cincy, grew up idolizing the Big Red Machine, and made it his goal to replace Dave Concepcion (another player who should be given serious Hall consideration), was the fact that he did it. He was by all accounts, a classy individual and a fierce team leader who played his entire career with one team.
  • I would like to see Larkin make it next year along with the Hawk. Great players with longevity.


    Robert
  • grote15grote15 Posts: 29,696 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You got me. He played on some bad teams but he has 9 Silver Sluggers, 11 All Star Teams and an MVP Award and a WS Ring (1990). He's as big a lock as locks get.

    You had to see Alomar to appreciate him, be he's also a lock. That guy could get to any ball seemingly.

    Blyleven is in my opinion a hall of very good guy. Only 27 games over 500 in his career - never finishing in the top 2 in Cy Youngs.

    He has a nice career WHIP (1.19) and good K/BB (almost 3 to 1) but other guys have similar numbers to those. It's not like he suffered on a losing team fr his whole career like Carlton did for many years. He moved around and was in the playoffs 3 times.


    I agree with you about Alomar and Larkin, but not about Blyleven...

    In a 22-year career, Blyleven made the playoffs a total of three times, including once as a 19-year-old rookie, and once as a 36-year old SP when the Twins won the World Series in 1987. The other 19 seasons he played for mostly below average clubs and would have easily won well over 300 games if he had been on a few better clubs.

    Steve Carlton, on the other hand, played for a total of EIGHT postseason clubs, and though the 1972 Phillies were definitely god awful, many of the Cardinals and Phillies teams he was on were actually quite good, and there is no question that he played for much better teams over the course of his career than did Blyleven. The most misleading stat on a pitcher's line is his W-L record, and Blyleven was a much better pitcher than his winning pct inducates: 5th all time in strikeouts and 9th all time in shutouts (which is probably as good an indication of any of a pitcher's dominance). His career ERA is also a very impressive 3.31. If you have guys like Catfish Hunter, Rich Gossage and Brice Sutter in the HOF, there is no reasonable explanation to keep Blyleven out, IMO.


    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Edgar deserves to be in...
    Am I speaking Chinese?



    image
  • RonBurgundyRonBurgundy Posts: 5,491 ✭✭✭
    Well, if we're going to hold the number of games lost against pitchers, let's throw Nolan Ryan out of the Hall. 324-292 lifetime record for a winning percentage of .5259. By contast, Blyleven's lifetime win-loss record was 287-250, for a .5345 winning percentage. He also remains 5th on the all time K list with 3701.



    Ron
    Ron Burgundy

    Buying Vintage, all sports.
    Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
  • PSASAPPSASAP Posts: 2,284 ✭✭✭
    One explanation for Barry Larkin's lack of recognition might be that he had the prime of his career during the years 1994-97, a time when baseball was experiencing its lowest levels of popularity due to the extended hangover of the strike. He also had a great 1998 season, but if your name wasn't Mark or Sammy, no one cared.
Sign In or Register to comment.