hey rose registry peeps!!
donrus
Posts: 603
i just submitted for a new "complete pete rose master set" . this is a set that if the psa grades it,it should be in this set. none of the well it does not have his stats from his last year carp! i hope it goews through. i think it will be nice. let me know what you think.. hey it could be a stupid idea..lol don
0
Comments
It never hurts to try .... Although I tried the same thing with the Mantle Master Registry set
and it .... well, it had the same chance of happening as the picture below
hope you have better luck!
PoppaJ
They have a hard enough time putting up sets of players from their playing days.
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
never heard anything back
al needs a set-he be in hof next year on senior ballot i hope, i got enuff autos and letters from him
<< <i>yeah, but why can't the cards that they take fees to grade be in sets? i have spent alot of money on psa cards. i just should have checked the psa out a little more, like before spending several thousand dollars on cards.i already have to have certain cardsn graded by beckett. i know when i start getting my daughter's pujols cards graded, they will all be beckett. we almost have 500 of his cards now.. don >>
Email Joe all that. See what he has to say
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
collecting 1977 topps baseball in psa 9 and psa 10
Never understood the name change.
R73 1933 Goudey Indian Gum - Series 288 - Nos. 118
Also looking for 1953 Parkhurst & 1953 Quaker Oats Ripley's BION.
If you have any available for sale PM me
<< <i>That sign would be about 1966, and it would say "ESSO", not "EXXON"".
Never understood the name change. >>
1966? 1966 Prices
Try 1956! 1956 Prices plus, what would have been $2.99? (sign in lower left corner).
Though we all know this sign is fabricated, it sure makes you ponder the good ol' days
PoppaJ
<< <i>well i got the big shoot down.they say that they only show case player sets when and till they played and if they had the last year played in the stats. what ever. im done with spending money on psa cards.. don russell >>
There's always the Collector's Showcase option. You can put whatever cards you want into one of those. Sure, there's no fancy certificate when you reach x% completion, but it's a way to show off your cards. Everyone has their own reasons to collect, so it's not my place to judge - nor am I, but I hardly think that the lack of availability of a set in the registry should be a reason to stop using a TPG.
Just my nickel...keep the change.
<< <i>well i got the big shoot down.they say that they only show case player sets when and till they played and if they had the last year played in the stats. what ever. im done with spending money on psa cards.. don russell >>
This has always been a PSA registry rule. What goes in what sets has been the debate. I could understand someone wanting to collect say a "Monster Set" or whatever you want to call it, but to even accomplish that you would have to have all the cards in the other sets. What I am more saying, is I collect Steve Young graded cards. The more cards I get, the more I am just interested in the basic cards from his playing days. I don't imagine I am the only one so I understand an emphasis on these cards. My biggest concern has been oddball cards which I don't think belong in basic sets, but I guess they have the new basic to take care of that concern. I also see how opening up a set to all "cards" might create more problems then it would be worth and as Matt noted, they can't seem to get all the basic sets online right now. My Saberhagen request will hit 3 years at the next HOF election. A Monster Pete Rose set might take 5 years to get up.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.