I like that design too ! Will be a beauty when it attains some peripheral toning.. Got my curiosity up so I went browsing: Found 1 on EvilBay "raw" with some toning..
<< <i>I like that design too ! Will be a beauty when it attains some peripheral toning.. Got my curiosity up so I went browsing: Found 1 on EvilBay "raw" with some toning.. >>
That one doesn't appear to be uncirculated -- I would call it AU. But the price isn't bad, even in that condition.
Nice coin, but think it was lucky to go 63 as it does have the "dipsies" and also a lot of bagmarking - the dog the cra- out of me when I submit anything like this. Not that grading numbers necessarily are important with this coin, but would probably go 58 on it for a number...
Love that Milled British (1830-1960) Well, just Love coins, period.
<< <i>Nice coin, but think it was lucky to go 63 as it does have the "dipsies" and also a lot of bagmarking - the dog the cra- out of me when I submit anything like this. Not that grading numbers necessarily are important with this coin, but would probably go 58 on it for a number... >>
I think it's definitely uncirculated because of the luster, just weakly struck, as are most of these. I'll agree the bagmarks are distracting, though these coins were minted in Berlin and shipped halfway around the world to Brazil, and bagmarks are rather common on them.
Here's one of mine of a different denomination. It's a lousy scan that doesn't show the luster and clean surfaces, but it's a PCGS MS66:
Obviously I can't be sure from a photo, but those are the points most likely to suffer from strike weakness. I've never seen one of these with full bonnet folds, not even in an original roll of 500 reis I once had the opportunity to look through. Even if it's roll friction it's probably not severe enough to bump it out of an MS grade by NGC's standards.
Comments
Got my curiosity up so I went browsing:
Found 1 on EvilBay "raw" with some toning..
<< <i>I like that design too ! Will be a beauty when it attains some peripheral toning..
Got my curiosity up so I went browsing:
Found 1 on EvilBay "raw" with some toning.. >>
That one doesn't appear to be uncirculated -- I would call it AU. But the price isn't bad, even in that condition.
Successful BST transactions with:CollectorsCoins, farthing, Filacoins, LordMarcovan, Duki, Spoon, Jinx86, ubercollector, hammered54
LochNess and ProfHaroldHill
Another 2000
DPOTD
Well, just Love coins, period.
<< <i>Nice coin, but think it was lucky to go 63 as it does have the "dipsies" and also a lot of bagmarking - the dog the cra- out of me when I submit anything like this. Not that grading numbers necessarily are important with this coin, but would probably go 58 on it for a number... >>
I think it's definitely uncirculated because of the luster, just weakly struck, as are most of these. I'll agree the bagmarks are distracting, though these coins were minted in Berlin and shipped halfway around the world to Brazil, and bagmarks are rather common on them.
Here's one of mine of a different denomination. It's a lousy scan that doesn't show the luster and clean surfaces, but it's a PCGS MS66:
Well, just Love coins, period.
Well, just Love coins, period.