Options
1970 Topps help requested
Does anyone know what PSA does with cards with a white line across top or bottom. Scans of two cards I am talking about below. They are nice cards but is it a waste of time to send them in for grading??? thanks al.
0
Comments
PM me if you want some cheap 8's, have around 50 extra
Current obsession, all things Topps 1969 - 1972
<< <i>It shouldn't affect the grade, have seen 8's and 9's with this line, John
PM me if you want some cheap 8's, have around 50 extra >>
I'll second what he said. 1970 Topps have been known to have a white or black line across the top or bottom on occasion. I have about a half dozen that have graded out well - although it does somewhat detract from the overall eye-appeal of the card - it usually doesn't affect the grade. Kinda like rough cuts from the 50's & early 60's.
Steve
<< <i>The L-R centering on the Mays is more concerning for a PSA 9. >>
Although the L-R centering is not what one should expect from a 9, the centering on this card does appear to fall within PSA's guidelines. Unofficially it is about 57/43. PSA allows for front centering on a 9 to be as poor as 65/35. The fact that this Mays got a 9 speaks not to PSA's grading ability, but to their standards.
Still, the card looks a heckuva a lot nicer than my raw Mays, which also has the dreaded white line. Nice card, Nick.
<< <i>perhaps the ugliest card of the 70's? >>
It's a close 3rd behind 1974 (worst) & 1977(2nd worst); 1979 isn't too far behind either! 1972 & 1975 are in 1st & 2nd place...........I'm kinda partial to 1973 also because it was the first year I remember rippin' packs..........oh, the good times to be 8 years old and opening baseball cards after a little league game chewing that powdered bubble gum pretending it was tobacco....I could go on, but that's another topic.