Home U.S. Coin Forum

Suspicious auction, raw 1922 No D cent

seanqseanq Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭✭✭
Link to auction

Among the red flags: private auction, very high value coin being sold raw, 10% restocking fee, and to top that all off the obverse photo looks like it was photoshopped to remove the mintmark. Last but not least, based on his feedback, most of his private auctions sold to the same buyer. Does anyone here see any reason to take a chance on an auction like this?


Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor

Comments

  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Your link dosen't work.
  • Well, it's been cleaned, thats for sure.

    I know some people on these boards have gotten good deals from time to time on raw coins. But when it comes to rarities, I will not bid on a raw coin. There is a reason this MS64RD 1922 no D is raw, it will forever be that way. Maybe in 100 years it will be market acceptable, so unless I was putting a collection together for the great grandchildren, I will pass.

    Your right, the area below the date looks odd like something was done to the photo.
    Life member of the SSDC
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,447 ✭✭✭
    red flags for sound reasons too on this one

    i don't like it for a no d

    i'd think removed weak d and way too strong of a reverse...cleaned and recolored

    i could make my own for less
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have serious reservations about the coin being genuine
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,046 ✭✭✭✭✭
    link worked for me!!

    I would stay clear of this auction its a win win for the seller not much left for the buyer.image

    If that coin was real it would be in a real auction and slabbed..

    I bought one raw and sent it into pcgs. That coin needs to be examined in hand by someone that can tell a real one from a fake.

    BUT if you must bid good luck to youimage
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    definitely NOT a real 22-plain

    K S
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmmmm, I've never seen one in that high a grade but the ones I've seen have a weak second 2. His
    1912 Matte Proof doesn't look like a Matte to me as well. Others will chime in but I'd not bid.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    No way is that a legit coin...and the seller is a complete goof with poor feedback. I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.
    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭
    Seller is notorious for cracking prob cents out of ANACS as well.......

    It was recently sold on the bay ( by another seller ), then Ebay cancelled the listing...
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08
  • GrumpyEdGrumpyEd Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭
    Was it the whizzed one that was bid up to almost 4K? (2 weeks ago)
    image
    Ed
  • drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 'listing' has been removed. I thought the 'D' was removed, rather than photoshopped.
  • ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The 'listing' has been removed. I thought the 'D' was removed, rather than photoshopped. >>



    That was my thinkin as well, it was much more obvious in the other sellers pics. Shocker did a bit of doctoring on the pic as well.
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08

  • Looks like it's back.......................Link
  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Reported........again.
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • Of course a true 1922 NO D cent Strong Reverse II, would have polish wear along the rim, with the "In God We Trust" weak and worn, among other characteristics.
    The Accumulator - Dark Lloyd of the Sith

    image
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,141 ✭✭✭✭
    Fake! Certainly not the real deal!!!
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • I saw this one also...nice strong details......way to strong. And their seems to be a "something" right under the first 2. maybe metal left over from a D being removed?
    "One of the advantages of being disorderly is that one is constantly making new discoveries" -A.A. Milne
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,894 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow. Suckers bid it up to $3250. Anyone who knows this mintage knows the obverse is soft, the 2nd "2" is weak, rim is weak, motto soft... How sad.
  • fiveNdimefiveNdime Posts: 1,088 ✭✭
    he'll make 10% on the return ($325.00 today) and relist it privately.
    would this be only the second time??? image


    his feedback (on slabbed) is good otherwise...
    BST transactions: guitarwes; glmmcowan; coiny; nibanny; messydesk

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file