To crack or not to crack? That is the question.
lsutigers1973
Posts: 11,093 ✭
Two of my "what happened" cards from recent sub. Centering on both is as close to perfect as you can get front and back. Corners are all sharp.
The Rose has one flaw I did not see before submitting. It still has a little wax residue on the front. It had a lot of wax but I thought I got it all off. I missed a little spot. I know there is a small fisheye but I have seen plenty of 78's in 10 holders with worse fisheyes. The white spots are on the scanner not the card.
The Puckett is 50/50 front and back, sharp corners, no wax and no fishies. Only want to crack becaue a 10 is worth 10x's as much as a 9.
Only one "I'm sorry this happened to you" reply allowed.
The Rose has one flaw I did not see before submitting. It still has a little wax residue on the front. It had a lot of wax but I thought I got it all off. I missed a little spot. I know there is a small fisheye but I have seen plenty of 78's in 10 holders with worse fisheyes. The white spots are on the scanner not the card.
The Puckett is 50/50 front and back, sharp corners, no wax and no fishies. Only want to crack becaue a 10 is worth 10x's as much as a 9.
Only one "I'm sorry this happened to you" reply allowed.
0
Comments
:-)
1994 Pro Line Live
TheDallasCowboyBackfieldProject
My Podcast - Now FEATURED on iTunes
The Puckett doesn't look like a 10 to me but some graders don't penalize for the rough edge so it is probably worth another shot. Though the bottom left corner doesn't look sharp due to the rough left edge but you never know.
However neither of those cards are really "what happened" scenarios. They both have flaws that can easily justify their current holders.
Robb
<< <i>I'll be first!! I'm sorry this happened to you >>
Quoting allowed?
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Are only certain cards allowed to have it?
I haven't played the resubmit game myself, but it seems frustrating.