Options
OTT-LITE question? Coin photography

Are 2 13 watt OTT-LITES really enough light for photos?
I am currently using (3) 60 watt GE reveal lights.
I see that the OTT-LITES are on sale again and I am considering getting 2, or 3?
Rob
I am currently using (3) 60 watt GE reveal lights.
I see that the OTT-LITES are on sale again and I am considering getting 2, or 3?
Rob

0
Comments
Check my website for examples.
-Paul
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
How about a link to the sale?
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
<< <i>Rob,
How about a link to the sale? >>
Here ya go.
<< <i>Lee, how did you get those OTT-LITES over the grand canyon?
That just shows how good they are.
Here you go.
They work great, and they are flexible, which is very, very handy for taking pics. Much cheaper than the ones linked also.
-Paul
<< <i>Rob, Luckily I still had the link to my OTT lights that I bought.
Here you go.
They work great, and they are flexible, which is very, very handy for taking pics. Much cheaper than the ones linked also.
-Paul >>
WOW are those the same as the ones i posted? Really?
<< <i>It's all a matter of personal preference. I like the OTT-LITE and use two:
Nuff said, I'm ordering a pair.
<< <i>Rob, Luckily I still had the link to my OTT lights that I bought.
Here you go.
They work great, and they are flexible, which is very, very handy for taking pics. Much cheaper than the ones linked also.
-Paul >>
Gooseneck 7 bucks, cfl 6-8 bucks.
<< <i>
<< <i>It's all a matter of personal preference. I like the OTT-LITE and use two:
>>
Nuff said, I'm ordering a pair. >>
I think you might be making a hasty decision....
Lee got it right, IMO, when he said it's a matter of personal preference. Lee takes great pictures, and I'd be the first to say it, but it isn't the OTT light that makes his pictures great. If you asked the 10 best photographers what lights they use, I'd bet you'd get at least 5 different answers, and you know what -- they are all right!
That said, there's no good reason (in my mind) why anyone with a camera with the ability to do a custom white balance* should spend $50+ on OTT lights, when other fluroescents will do just as good of a job rendering color. Even a simple incandescent bulb with a $3 clip on reflector, with the right camera and a custom white balance can produce results like this:
* Note: If your camera doesn't have the ability to do a custom white balance, you may be better off with a light like the OTT which provides a more balanced color spectrum which will be handled better by the lack of sophisticated white balance engine in the camera, or twiddling with white balance in post processing.
Respectfully submitted....Mike
<< <i>Gooseneck 7 bucks, cfl 6-8 bucks. >>
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution