Out of focus a bit and the white balance is off.....maybe a tad but dark as well but..............way better than a lot of folks can do. At least we can get a really good idea just what the coin would look like in hand. Might want to use a tri-pod if your not becuase that can clean up macro images quite a bit.
<< <i>Out of focus a bit and the white balance is off.....maybe a tad but dark as well but..............way better than a lot of folks can do. At least we can get a really good idea just what the coin would look like in hand. Might want to use a tri-pod if your not becuase that can clean up macro images quite a bit.
Good Luck and remember practice makes perfect >>
Shane's right. A good start, but you need a little work with focus/sharpness, white balance (a bit too warm), and exposure (a bit underexposed). Respectfully...Mike
Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Comments
Good Luck and remember practice makes perfect
bob
<< <i>Out of focus a bit and the white balance is off.....maybe a tad but dark as well but..............way better than a lot of folks can do. At least we can get a really good idea just what the coin would look like in hand. Might want to use a tri-pod if your not becuase that can clean up macro images quite a bit.
Good Luck and remember practice makes perfect >>
Shane's right. A good start, but you need a little work with focus/sharpness, white balance (a bit too warm), and exposure (a bit underexposed). Respectfully...Mike
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.