NCS Genuine or PCGS Genuine?

I bought a raw '76-CC Trade Dollar several years ago that I knew was polished lightly and was certain of authenticity. I bought it primarily 'cause it is the scarce mintmark variety, and it currently is in a Classic ANACs holder, UNC DETAILS, Polished. Without considering the actual appearance, which service would you rather see reholder this?
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
0
Comments
i'm too biased to give you a preference as i luv my pcgs
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
an example lay in the 09vdb matte proof that has been rejected for ????
being this coin now is bringing moon money...us poor folks now have hope of completing this registry set
<< <i>I would leave it as is. It has already been certified as genuine. >>
Good point. Anyone knowledgeable about ANACs from the time frame in which it was authenticated would know that Skip Fazzari had a part in the process, and that speaks volumes.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
<< <i>So, PCGS holders problem coins? Did I miss the update on this service? >>
PCGS will now designate authentic coins with problems as Genuine, for $100 per coin.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
<< <i>I would leave it as is. It has already been certified as genuine. >>
an amazing bit of common sense. i really cannot get over the
fact you would want to switch plastic in this case. it is all about
the coin and not the tpg.
<< <i>
<< <i>So, PCGS holders problem coins? Did I miss the update on this service? >>
PCGS will now designate authentic coins with problems as Genuine, for $100 per coin. >>
Genuine? Do they assign a grade to it or just call it Genuine? Thank you, I've been wanting to know this before sending several ms coins that were dipped at some point
in their 200 year existance.
Thanks
K S
<< <i>
<< <i>I would leave it as is. It has already been certified as genuine. >>
Good point. Anyone knowledgeable about ANACs from the time frame in which it was authenticated would know that Skip Fazzari had a part in the process, and that speaks volumes. >>
Agree. Leave it in the ANACS slab and save your money for new coins.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
and think it might bring more money in a different holder,
or question the validity of the previous evaluation
I would leave it alone and save the reholdering fees
<< <i>I would leave it as is. It has already been certified as genuine. >>
<< <i>
<< <i>I would leave it as is. It has already been certified as genuine. >>
Me too. -Preussen