1975 topps rack pack cracking woes
mikelowell25
Posts: 1,252 ✭✭✭
opened a beautiful ungraded 1975 topps baseball rack pack the other day that i bought almost two years ago; the majority of the 42 cards are gorgeous, clean and well-centered. (some have centering issues); i pulled a ryan highlights #5, a bench, a garvey (that one was guaranteed as it was the top card in one of the sections), a hernandez rookie and a 62 mvp's (mantle-wills). the bench would be an easy 9: it has perfect corners and centering, however, of course it has to have a yellow diagonal line or semi-smudge (almost looks like a crayon mark) that runs from the bottom edge of the card starting under the second "n" in "johnny" up through the "y" in johnny and ends where the red section meets the white section, just to the left of the "b" in bench. (sorry for the longwinded description, but i dont know how to post pictures). my question is: would psa assign a "pd" or "mk" qualifier to the card because of this?? i'm thinking "pd", but maybe they would disregard it because its otherwise a perfect card. any help or thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated--thanks in advance!!
0
Comments
Or Regional Canadian Baseball Issues?
Come be a contributor to the OPC Baseball Wiki. It's free and easy!
OPeeChee.Wikispaces.Com
Bosox1976
D's: 54S,53P,50P,49S,45D+S,44S,43D,41S,40D+S,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S,all 16-34's
Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
74T: 37,38,47,151,193,241,435,570,610,654,655 97 Finest silver: 115,135,139,145,310
73T:31,55,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,152,165,189,213,235,237,257,341,344,377,379,390,422,433,453,480,497,545,554,563,580,606,613,630
95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects,HR Kings,On-Base Leaders,Power Plus,RBI Kings,Rising Stars
That would seem to make sense, but the value of 1975 unopened product (with the possible exception of rack packs) has actually declined somewhat over the last 5 years. I think there is much more product out there than we realize.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Wow. Worth alot more today.
I thought this was a current thread until I read Tim’s response, lol.
It goes to show just how stagnant values were up till around 2011 or so. You could buy 75 cellos and racks prior to that for $75 and $125, respectively, for years. From that point forward, the market changed drastically. I'm glad I saved as much as I did and wish I had bought more, LOL.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
I miss Don.
I nearly collapsed on the floor reading this until I saw that date stamp lol
ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240
As a Garvey collector, it is sad to hear that a Garvey on top pack was destroyed. I would probably have never been willing to pay the premium for one that old (I think 78 was my oldest) to keep it from getting ripped though.
That said, I don't collect unopened (except Garvey on top packs), and frankly disagree with the whole concept in theory. I understand it, but these packs were meant to be opened and enjoyed. HOWEVER, since there is such a market for them and especially with player collectors finding their favorite players on top, it is now sad to hear of great old packs that somehow survived the incredibly powerful pull of being opened for so long, succumbing finally.