Biletnikoff,brown,rc's.bump worthy?new scans added

goraiders

Just got some free subs and figured i would see if these were worthy of a little bumpage?
I'm not sure what happened on the brown scan,the back is not stained and is very bright and looks great



so what do you think?submit in case or crack and resub?or just keep them how they are?

see new scans below.

rexvos

hard to tell on 65s I would think so on both.

On a sidenote Brown does not look right in a Broncos uni.

goraiders

not only does he not look right,it looks even worse with my all-time raiders set!

goraiders

Opinions?anyone?

envoy98

First, remember that the 65's need to go on their own submission as tall boys.

I would say no to them all. Here is why, the Biletnikoff and Brown are both too OC to get the .5 bump I think. The Biletnikoff is a really nice looking card from the scan, so if you have some other 65's for review, I might toss it on that sub. On it's own merits though, I don't think it makes it. The Lamonica, the top 2 and bottom left corners look touched, but that could just be the scan. The bottom right looks perfectly sharp though.

Good luck if you decide to send them in.

-Josh

goraiders

Thanks for the input josh,here's some better scans.Hope this helps a little more.











hope this helps mike.i'm still trying to get the new scanner down.

Mickey71

The 65 Fred B looks like it is high end. It has a shot. The problem as stated by another poster is that the tall boys go by themselves. I will never understand a logical reason for this. When they are reviewed they are in the holder--Why the seperate sub? It makes it hard to send in any Tall boys==very pricey. Send in the Fred B. Don't send in the Brown- no chance at .5.
Mickey71

Publius

i think they are both a little OC top to bottom. Fantastic looking cards though, nothing to be ashamed of there!!