What percentage of Major Leagues do you think were on steroids and/or HGH before the Mitchell Repor

SeatedCoin

Many naive fans think that if a player wasn't in the Mitchell report they were clean but we all know better. Recently when I told my son I thought that a certain player was once on the juice he said that it was not true since that player wasn't named in the Mitchell Report. It got me thinking on really how unfair the report was, especially when Bud, my favorite all time Commish, named a Director and part owner of a MLB team as the lead investigator.

perkdog

60% +

BobaFett72

40-60%

look at the how low the HR totals are this season. Unlikely anyone will hit 50, which had become quite common.

perkdog

<< <i>40-60%

look at the how low the HR totals are this season. Unlikely anyone will hit 50, which had become quite common. >>



Chase Utley looked like he was on pace which IMO considering his frame would have been/will be most immpressive.

SeatedCoin

I said 60%-79%.

RonBurgundy

99.9 %. The only exception being Greg Maddux.



RB

lawnmowerman

Probably only about 5% because Barry Bonds had the market cornered

yawie99

I doubt it was more than a 1/3.

MantleMarisFordBerra

I voted for 40% to 60%, but the truth is 100% will be looked at with suspicion and that's a shame.

thegemmintman

Around a third.

bigfische

i agree with right around 30%