Wow! That's A Truly Great Looking 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle SGC 10

JackWESQ · June 15, 2008 1:54PM

Slight crease or no slight crease, that's a great looking 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle SGC 10!

/s/ JackWESQ

Allen · June 15, 2008 2:03PM

Paper loss on the back and the guy doesn't show the back. Thats annoying, but it is a nice card.

storm888 · June 15, 2008 2:07PM

Seems foolish to make folks ask for a picture of the back.

SDSportsFan · June 15, 2008 2:15PM

<< <i>Seems foolish to make folks ask for a picture of the back. >>

Yup...when it's the sole reason for the grade, it needs to be shown.

Steve

Allen · June 15, 2008 2:27PM

I guess he hopes someone might overlook that in his description. Here is the back.

storm888 · June 15, 2008 2:38PM

It could be worse.

JackWESQ · June 15, 2008 3:09PM

Ug. If it's too good to be true ...

/s/ JackWESQ

SDSportsFan · June 15, 2008 4:13PM

I just noticed something else.....

Why does SGC label the card as a "ROOKIE"?

Every real collector knows this card is NOT Mickey's rookie card.

Steve

65nova · June 15, 2008 5:22PM

Any guess on final price?

Morgoth · June 15, 2008 10:17PM

Ellyn is a good dealer.

BobaFett72 · June 15, 2008 11:39PM

good dealer or not, there should be a back scan and you shouldnt have to request the damn thing.

1989FleerBillRipkencollector · June 15, 2008 11:41PM

Back Scan available upon request, 100% authentic, from original collector's 1952 Topps Set Break!------

Way to save .15 !!!

Comments