Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

1965 TOPPS #577 PSA 9 SHORT PRINT NOT IN SMR WHAT IS ITS BOOK VALUE?

BrinsdBrinsd Posts: 87 ✭✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Can anyone give me an idea of what the book value for this card might be as it is not given in the SMR.

1965 TOPPS #577 A.L. ROOKIES SHORT PRINT PSA 9

There are 39 Graded PSA 9 and 1 Graded PSA 10

image

Thanks In Advance

Bill
For Sale Or Trade: Joe DiMaggio Signed PSA/DNA Authenticated First Edition/First Printing 1946 "Lucky To Be A Yankee" Book, Always Looking To Buy N.Y. Yankee & Thurman Munson Cards & Memorabilia, Lots Of Raw 1963 1964, 1965, 1968, 1969 Topps Baseball and 1963 Raw & Graded Fleer Baseball

Comments

  • nam812nam812 Posts: 10,602 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The last 5 sales of that card in PSA 9 have averaged $37.81
  • BrinsdBrinsd Posts: 87 ✭✭
    Also the 2008 SCD shows the 1965 Topps book values for cards 1 - 455.

    What happened to the inclusion of the last 143 cards in the set.

    I never noticed this before as my collection only contained cards up to #454 but now I have 8 PSA graded cards beyond #456.

    Is this a screw up in the SCD or is there a reason for not them not including the card and values for each card in the entire set in their book?

    Totally Confused...

    Bill
    For Sale Or Trade: Joe DiMaggio Signed PSA/DNA Authenticated First Edition/First Printing 1946 "Lucky To Be A Yankee" Book, Always Looking To Buy N.Y. Yankee & Thurman Munson Cards & Memorabilia, Lots Of Raw 1963 1964, 1965, 1968, 1969 Topps Baseball and 1963 Raw & Graded Fleer Baseball
  • BobaFett72BobaFett72 Posts: 7,304
    lol.
    the set does have a rather large high series image not sure why its not included....
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    SMR for that card is 95.00 BUT, I have never seen it sell for that.

    39 PSA 9 cards makes it one of the most prolific in that regard.

    I think White Sox rookies has more. (541)

    With that said if you can get 45.00 for it you did well.


    Steve

    Good for you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Also, one other thing regarding 1965 Topps high numbers and short prints they are not scarce.

    As a matter of fact they may be as abundant as 1st series cards.

    The real tuffies for this set reside in the 3rd and 4th series.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • BrinsdBrinsd Posts: 87 ✭✭
    I decided this weekend I was going to work on the 1965 Topps Set as I have about 200 of the cards in mid grade quality and about 50 high grade quality.

    A few reasons I have chosen to begin this set are for one I like the look of the 1965 Topps cards, two I can find many of the cards in the set in high grade condition, and three because I think the cards are genreally cheap for cards from the 1960's, and lastly many of the stars found in this set also played in the 1950's but the 1950's cards are out of my price range in most cases for the high quality I would like to own.

    Is there a reason for the abundance of 1965 Topps that seem to be readily available as well as relatively inexpensive?

    Why in comparison are they less expensive than other 1960's cards/sets?

    Are there any other bargain sets from this or any other decade that anyone would reccomend?

    What are the some of the best bargain cards seen in the market today in your opinion for pre 1978 cards?

    Thank you all once again, I appreciate the input!

    Bill
    For Sale Or Trade: Joe DiMaggio Signed PSA/DNA Authenticated First Edition/First Printing 1946 "Lucky To Be A Yankee" Book, Always Looking To Buy N.Y. Yankee & Thurman Munson Cards & Memorabilia, Lots Of Raw 1963 1964, 1965, 1968, 1969 Topps Baseball and 1963 Raw & Graded Fleer Baseball
  • BobaFett72BobaFett72 Posts: 7,304
    I think its a great and affordable set. Go for it! im about 70% done with mine...
  • darkhorse9darkhorse9 Posts: 90
    I am finishing up my 1965 set. I love the way it looks in sheets.

    The reason it is affordable is th elack of rookies or high priced scaricities. The highest priced rookie is the Steve Carlton. Even in high grade t can be had for under $200. After that you've got Tony Perez and Jim Hunter as the only key rookies.

    Even the traditional stars arereasonable. It one of the more affordable Mantles out there.

    As for other sets...the 1964 set is probably the cheapest post-war Topps set out there. Again, no big rookies or scarce high number short prints. Thge Mantle is in the first series which helps to keep the price of that one down.
  • digicatdigicat Posts: 8,551 ✭✭
    What's the series breakdown for this set?
    My Giants collection want list

    WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25
Sign In or Register to comment.