With wide spread milk spots on both unc and proof silver eagles shouldn't PCGS
Griv
Posts: 2,804 ✭
require that top collections publish pictures of their coins to ensure that a PR70DCAM isn't really a PR68 in terms of the Registry? Would it be too hard to track this when we are talking about a unique problem with these eagles? I even heard a rumor that the 95-W 70 is no longer "technically" a 70 due to this issue. I have had conversations with the top silver eagle collector and he agrees 100%.
0
Comments
Why won't someone in the know give us the skinny on this? It can't be that freakin proprietary.
THAT WOULD ELIMINATE THE CHANCE THAT THE TPG'S HOLDERS ARE CAUSING THE MILK SPOTS...
The name is LEE!
<< <i>The registry is all about the number on the label, so it really makes no difference what the coin looks like. >>
Truer werds wuz never posted.
<< <i>The registry is all about the number on the label, so it really makes no difference what the coin looks like. >>
That's not entirely true. Besides, what do you know of the Registry?
<< <i>
<< <i>The registry is all about the number on the label, so it really makes no difference what the coin looks like. >>
That's not entirely true. Besides, what do you know of the Registry? >>
Well there are some people who buy the number on the slab instead of the coin, which would be obvious if you have ever seen or purchased some of the coins that come from these sets. It happens in the top ranked sets too. Some collectors just aren't/weren't very picky. Then again there are others who if you buy their registry coins you now you are getting something nice. You kind of learn who has a good eye for quality and who doesn't.