Opinions on the .5 grading scale

After a few months with the .5 grading in place, I'm curious as to everyone's thoughts on the subject.
My feeling is this.
All truly high end cards, whatever the grade, already exhibit the characteristics that warrant a .5 bump. These cards already demand a premium when they are sold. They are typically purchased by knowledgeable collectors who don't need someone to tell them it's a very strong card. Doesn't take long on eBay to figure that out. Therefore the .5 bump is of little value.
It may even work against you. Buyers who are satisfied with a clean 7 or 8 may not want to pay a premium for the .5 bump, and drop out of the bidding for a card with a .5 grade. I've done this myself quite a few times. If I want a nice 8, why pay a premium for the .5?
In other words, high end cards have always drawn higher bids because of their quality without the need for a grader to tell them that the quality is there.
There are only 2 reasons to submit a card for a .5 bump:
1 - it is a vintage card with a LARGE difference between the grades
2 - it is very possible that the card will bump up an entire grade
Your thoughts?
My feeling is this.
All truly high end cards, whatever the grade, already exhibit the characteristics that warrant a .5 bump. These cards already demand a premium when they are sold. They are typically purchased by knowledgeable collectors who don't need someone to tell them it's a very strong card. Doesn't take long on eBay to figure that out. Therefore the .5 bump is of little value.
It may even work against you. Buyers who are satisfied with a clean 7 or 8 may not want to pay a premium for the .5 bump, and drop out of the bidding for a card with a .5 grade. I've done this myself quite a few times. If I want a nice 8, why pay a premium for the .5?
In other words, high end cards have always drawn higher bids because of their quality without the need for a grader to tell them that the quality is there.
There are only 2 reasons to submit a card for a .5 bump:
1 - it is a vintage card with a LARGE difference between the grades
2 - it is very possible that the card will bump up an entire grade
Your thoughts?
"Molon Labe"
0
Comments
Simsbury Taverneers
My PSA Sets
it makes sense in theory.. but has not closed the gaps..
from what I have seen and the straight 7's seem to be down..
still a good money maker for psa.. maybe the market will adjust at some point
to me... a 7 is a 7.. and an 8 an 8.. regardless of the .5
I didn't like the .5 grade from the get go.. and still do not.. oh well..
nothing we can do about it.. I have some I will send in for review..
but I am actually hoping for the full grade bumps..
I have a card I sent to PSA and it came back an 8.5 when I knew it was a solid Mint 9, if not a 10, but I wouldn't go that far and say 10, but it definetly was a SOLID 9!
Good thing I don't do vintage or I probably would be pissed. I do autographs, so I really don't care what the condition of the card is, as long as the autograph itself is 100% then its all good with me.
For vintage cards, I say the .5 scale is a very bad thing, but not for me.
Giovanni
It's a money grab and reeks of desperation.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
At this point, I would somewhat agree with what Griffins and Bigreddog posted.
The half grades haven't changed my buying habits or made me want to have my nice 8's reviewed. I already can distinguish a high-end 8 from a low end 8.
To sum up: good for sellers=more money in their pockets, not that great for buyers= having to pay more for cards that use to be in 8 holders.
I can't judge 6.5's and lower because I don't collect that grade (Not that there's anything wrong with anyone who does).
Steve
So I pretty much haven't seen any effect on the modern side.
Overall, I like it as it puts the top graders, somewhat on the same scale giving a better ability to compare the three.
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
WTB: 2001 Leaf Rookies & Stars Longevity: Ryan Jensen #/25