Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Natural toning or artifical????

Posted this in the US forum, but since it is a world coin, hoping to get some help from you "dark siders."


http://cgi.ebay.com/1921-MO-PCGS-AU53-Mexico-Colorful-Scarce-Date-Dos-Peso_W0QQitemZ230235310838QQihZ013QQcategoryZ541QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


Greg Cohen

Senior Numismatist

Legend Rare Coin Auctions

Comments

  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    Well, in my short numismatic career, I have never seen anything tone like that naturally (those specific colors). I have seen Canadian dollars, in the velvet clamshell cases, tone in many weird fashions. To me, being a newb at this, I would say artificial, but then again I'm not the expert. I do like the coin itself but toning like that though, is not my thing. I also don't know much about having coins slabbed but I would venture that PCGS would have noted if they thought it was AT (I have seen holders sayn AU or MS then a note saying Artificially Toned)... again I'm not the expert and I'm only offering my opinions as a means to provoke thought.
    Todd
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    On a side note, while lurking on the lightside (shhhh don't tell anyone) I saw threads and post where people talked about baking coins in the over and artificially toning them. The seller has a 100% feedback rating so that is good. Here is where I get gun shy. His name is Greattoning so that suggest that he either collects/sells toned coins, or he is making them. I don't know the guy so knocking him on here wouldn't be kosher. I guess it boils down to the coin and whether you truly want it. That's what matters in this hobby... do you like and have to have it, or is it just another coin...
    Todd
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,458 ✭✭✭✭✭
    link

    It must be Natural toning, PCGS slabed it. image

    I think the colors may not be so bright in person, just my opinion. It probably is natural toning in that it was left on a reactive surface or in a bag of some type.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    Thanks for clarifying. I know I have seen several coins slabbed that indicated they were AT. I couldn't remember what company did them. Thanks!
    Todd
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I vote for NT. I'm a huge skeptic when it comes to "monster toners", but this one doesn't raise too many flags for me.
  • WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    Market acceptable NT. I have seen a lot of PCGS/NGC graded Morgan dollars with the same type of toning pattern.
    Incidentally, I recall a post here about a year ago wherein someone lamented that nicely toned 2P were very difficult to locate.
  • JCMhoustonJCMhouston Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭
    Sorry, but it sure doesn't look natural to me, it may well be market acceptable, but that doesn't mean natural. One of the dealers advertises on ebay that some of his pieces are "artistically toned", that may be Greattoning, but I have no problem when you are told it's AT.
  • PCGS would have body bagged it, but there are supposedly Artificially toned coins in holders, thus CAC for us light siders.
    Greg Cohen

    Senior Numismatist

    Legend Rare Coin Auctions
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,661 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My take is, "if it's in top-tier plastic, who cares".

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,583 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Uhhhh, because even "P" has made some whopping mistakes in the past!

    Please be serious on the NT - this has been beat to death on the lite side and I think everything should now be called NT - PSYCH! That seller has had so many similarly toned coins from the US to Zanzibar (you get the drift) that it is ridiculous.

    From the lite side discussions, I doubt that anybody will be convinced, so I say let the All-AT team go for the gusto and spend all their money on these lovelies.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I seriously think it's NT.
  • AuldFartteAuldFartte Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭✭
    Natural, IMHO, regardless of who slabbed it image
    I've seen several similar to that.
    image

    My OmniCoin Collection
    My BankNoteBank Collection
    Tom, formerly in Albuquerque, NM.


  • << <i>That seller has had so many similarly toned coins from the US to Zanzibar (you get the drift) that it is ridiculous. >>



    Ridiculous is you making an uninformed comment like this. If this coin is artificially toned then point out the reasons why, not attack the seller.

    The coin is clearly natural as are most all of the coins Dick sells. He has sold some questionable coins as all dealers have, but he sells them after the experts at the T.P.G. examine them.
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,583 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ridiculous actually is your comment as I have noticed before ignorance reigns supreme; in point of fact I do have the expertise to make such comments and a technical background which will not be belabored at this juncture. These are cooked on sulfides/sulfa oxidants and you can believe or not, that is the case.

    I did not criticize the seller as they are only providing material to buyers who demand such. This coin's toning has been turned out time and time again by this seller with many different iterations. I DID NOT CRITICIZE THE SELLER!

    These colors are not natural, but buy away if you choose - heck, if you are paying enough it may be that I start selling into the market.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • laurentyvanlaurentyvan Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭
    If it's At, it's pretty good.

    The coin in question seems to have toning that "creeps" and blends naturally over raised surfaces and fields.

    Most AT I've seen has severe demarcation lines and looks much more fake.

    This one isn't bad and as LordM stated, it's in a PCGS holder.
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics
    is that you end up being governed by inferiors. – Plato


  • << <i>Ridiculous actually is your comment as I have noticed before ignorance reigns supreme; in point of fact I do have the expertise to make such comments and a technical background which will not be belabored at this juncture. These are cooked on sulfides/sulfa oxidants and you can believe or not, that is the case.

    I did not criticize the seller as they are only providing material to buyers who demand such. This coin's toning has been turned out time and time again by this seller with many different iterations. I DID NOT CRITICIZE THE SELLER!

    These colors are not natural, but buy away if you choose - heck, if you are paying enough it may be that I start selling into the market. >>



    You did not criticize the seller but you are calling him a coin doctor and stating that he is artificial toning coins. You are an ignorant fool. If you keep your mouth closed then less people will know this embarrassing fact about you.
  • DesertRatDesertRat Posts: 1,791
    looks AT to me but then what do I know?

    The fact that it is slabbed means a lot less since it has been proven that coins can be AT'd once they are in holders.
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Flying Eagle, there's no reason for personal insults. Please try to hold a civilized conversation on this forum, even if the topic is as controversial as doctoring. 7Jaguars posted his observations about the seller selling toned coins that displayed similar colors, which is true, but it can be also easily attributed to the fact that the seller specialized in selling toned coins (thus his eBay name).


  • << <i>Flying Eagle, there's no reason for personal insults. Please try to hold a civilized conversation on this forum, even if the topic is as controversial as doctoring. 7Jaguars posted his observations about the seller selling toned coins that displayed similar colors, which is true, but it can be also easily attributed to the fact that the seller specialized in selling toned coins (thus his eBay name). >>



    7jaguars stated that I was ignorant. I am pointing out that it is he who is the ignorant one. He has attacked an Ebay seller and forum member and made unsubstantiated and false claims about what this person does. His proof of this is that he knows but will not belabor us with the facts.

    He is not pointing out his observations, but rather outright calling the seller a coin doctor. Observe: This coin's toning has been turned out time and time again by this seller with many different iterations. 7jaguars needs to provide proof of his allegations or he needs to apologize to the seller and retract all his libelous allegations. I suspect he is not righteous enough to do either.
  • MrDMrD Posts: 2,589 ✭✭✭
    For the record I take my reputation seriously. 98% of the coins I sell are consignments from people all over the United States and in some cases other parts of the world. I am known for my ability to take photographs of colorful toned coins and get high prices for them. That is why people send them to me. I couldn't tone a coin if my life depended on it.
    Since my living depends on getting consignments, I can't pick and choose what I sell. I do believe that the 1921 Dos Peso is absolutely naturally toned but then again its just my opinion.
    Thank you for listening.
    Regards,
    MrD
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭


    << <i>For the record I take my reputation seriously. 98% of the coins I sell are consignments from people all over the United States and in some cases other parts of the world. I am known for my ability to take photographs of colorful toned coins and get high prices for them. That is why people send them to me. I couldn't tone a coin if my life depended on it.
    Since my living depends on getting consignments, I can't pick and choose what I sell. I do believe that the 1921 Dos Peso is absolutely naturally toned but then again its just my opinion.
    Thank you for listening.
    Regards,
    MrD >>


    Hrmm... that's like saying, "I don't make the counterfeits, I just sell them for others". I understand you consign stuff but don't you think the scrupulous thing to do would be to put in the auction that the coin in hand may or may not be AT? I know I would but then again that's me. A consignment person should ALWAYS note that they are consigning the item for someone else. Just a CYA sorta thing. I think some of your coins are beautiful, but I wouldn't buy them because toning really isn't my thing, but again...that's just me. No one here was attacking the seller's character, we were just trying to find a way to help the buyer decide if the coin was AT or NT..... We as collectors have no right to attack the counterfeiters and such if we don't take every precaution to make sure our auctions are honest and well represented. I think not disclosing that the coin is consignment and you don't know if it is AT or NT, then to me that is somewhat deceptive....
    Todd
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,740 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Guys, guys, come on now! MrD said he doesn't doctor coins. He is a seller with 100% feedback with over 8,000 items sold. I don't care what anyone says, but this shows outstanding business ethics and the fact that he takes his reputation seriously. The fact that he posted on this thread only further supports that.

    We all need to go out and enjoy our Friday evening.
  • WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    Hey, let's talk about something else? How about politics or religion? image
  • mrpotatoheaddmrpotatoheadd Posts: 7,576 ✭✭


    << <i>We all need to go out and enjoy our Friday evening. >>

    No problem- I've got ribs on the grill and a beer in my hand (well... actually, on the desk as I'm typing) right now. image
  • HussuloHussulo Posts: 2,953 ✭✭✭
    I think the question that needs to be asked is, what do YOU (open question to everybody) the collector define as being “natural toning”?

    The natural toning I know and see often on many British coins is one which has taken decades or even centuries to build, rarely comes in rainbow colours. It is usually just the darkening or a dark patina developing on a coin. I accept that if coins are kept in envelopes or say a window sill there is a chance of them developing some colour. Now some critics might even argue that deliberately keeping a coin in a place where you know it's got a good chance of toning colourfully as aiding in it toning. Therefore they argue the coin in a way has become artificially toned.

    So again the question I ask is what exactly do you consider to be “natural toning”? If the answer is to allow the coin to develop its own natural patina over a long period of time without any intervention or help, then there are many coins for sale world wide which do not fit the bill.

    It will be interesting to see where others draw the line between NT and AT toned coins. Many collectors in the UK don't really go for colourful coins but it may catch on. Personally I like some but not all of them, just like coins with dark patina, again I like some but not all of them.


    Regards,
    Hus

  • I think the coin is NT and some people on this board need to take their midol!
  • ASUtoddASUtodd Posts: 1,312 ✭✭
    No...I don't think we need to take our midol. Opinions are opinions, and much like buttholes we all have one, cept some smell worse than others. image We live in a WONDERFUL country (well some of us live in other WONDERFUL countries - I'm not knocking anyone's country) where we can voice our opinions. I think we have all done that, and that is ok. My biggest beef with a AT coin is that it is the same as a cleaned coin. Both surfaces have been altered from their natural stated by purposeful human means. If you ask me, all coins with toning have been altered from their original natural stated by some means along the way. It could have been oils from someones fingers, it could have been the coin flip it was in, humidity, acid, who knows. The point is I like coins to be in their original fresh state. Hard to find them that way and when you do you pay a premium. The coin to me looks AT... he asked what we thought, and that is what I think. I also told him that if he liked the coin to buy it regardless. Buy the coin for what you WANT and what you LIKE (the seller has a 100% feedback so you know he's a good seller)..... Thats the beauty of this hobby.... what I find beautiful, someone else will find ugly (kinda like our mates in life). Thats how it works. Now, live long and prosper!
    Todd
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,583 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well said! I will say that flying eagle has no concept of any chemistry obviously but I can not tell him to check his chemistry books; frankly I do not have to prove anything to him. A little education may actually help him.

    I have only stated what is obvious and has been done before in terms of coin surfaces.

    Furthermore, do NOT put words in my mouth as I have no knowledge where these coins originate and the primary party involved has spoken in any case.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • DoogyDoogy Posts: 4,508


    ahhh......yes......the ole' liteside(ish) NT versus AT debate. This is something that we as darksiders are not immune to, but since a tremendous percentage of our darkside coins werent' kept in sulfur laden bags, stored away in sometimes damp vaults for decades, they usually don't impart wild colors ala Morgan dollars. However, as Hus pointed out, many coins still picked up nice toning (albeit generally darker, and less "colorful") in old-world coin cabinets, et cetera.

    Americans have generally gone toner wild these last few years, paying huge (and i mean HUGE) multiples of some colorfully toned "monsters"; most of these are classic US coins, especially Morgan dollars. If you're unaware of these, it won't take more than a few minutes on the liteside forum to track some down. Darksiders usually don't fall into this camp for the most part; while nice toning may bring a premium, you generally won't find a coin going for several times it's book value just because of the toning.

    However, the whole "premium for the toner monsters" debate has sparked a lot of discussion, and gnashing of teeth in regards to the two major TPGs being able to point them out and keep them out of their holders.

    Some may remember this brewhaha that had everyone all worked up over there. It sparked nearly 400 posts in 4 days, and most agreed it was slabbed as NT when it clearly wasn't (heck, PCI got it right and PCGS missed the mark while giving it a point bump!) This was/is a $25 coin, that was for sale on ebay for $2500 by a forum member. In the midst of the forum uprising, the seller pulled the auction; who knows where it resides now, but i'm sure some sucker paid big money for it just because PCGS slabbed someone's kitchen chemistry experiment.

    Heck, there was even a forum member on the liteside forum that used to brag about "making" toners, getting them slabbed in PCGS and NGC plastic, and then showing them off and bragging at major US coin shows. I know two folks that saw these things, and talked to him in person. He stated he wasn't interested in selling as he felt it would be dishonest, he just wanted to stroke his own ego enough to see if he could pull it off. But you can be sure that there are many more like him out there that are getting these into top tier holders, and are certainly selling them to the unaware.

    image

    ......and of course you have this stuff. Purchased at auction in an NCS details "proof - cleaned" slab", cracked out and toned by a doctor, then presto: instant PCGS PF63!

    click here

    and for those that thinks "who cares, it is in a top tier holder!", i'll bet the owner would like to know that he paid $50k for something that was damaged goods and worth much (and still is!) less just a few months prior.

    my whole point is that I believe we as darksiders don't have as much to worry about from people artifically toning coins. There isn't a huge premium for color, and the really good coin doctors seem to be too busy making tons of cash doing it to US coins to worry about foreign coins.

  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Uhhhh, because even "P" has made some whopping mistakes in the past! >>



    They have indeed. The coin being discussed is not one of those mistakes, though. It's NT. I don't think it's all that attractive, but it does look natural.

    Russ, NCNE
  • newsmannewsman Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭
    I just noticed something interesting -- based on the photo, the wear appears to be post-toning, as the worn spots appear white. What might that mean?
  • Thanks for the reminder... I forgot to check greattoning's offerings this week image
  • critocrito Posts: 1,735
    It's AT.
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,449 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would rather see the coin in hand before offering an opinion... not that my opinion matters as the coin has been looked at by very capable graders.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Sign In or Register to comment.