Grade this Rooselvelt for me.
 of 4-17-04 004.jpg)
UtahCoin
Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
What do you think?
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
0
Comments
I had to look pretty hard to find the hits but I found them. I would say MS65-66.
It's a lock 65, and may 66 with the toning.
I'll say MS65. No Full Bands.
<< <i>I agree with BECOKA.
It's a lock 65, and may 66 with the toning. >>
Toning increases the grade? I did not know that.
<< <i>Toning increases the grade? I did not know that. >>
It doesn't increase the technical grade. But it could increase the market grade if the graders "price" the coin instead of strictly grading it.
<< <i>I admit that as much as I like them....I cannot grade them at all. It looks like it has a little bit of rub on the cheek, hair,torch and flame...but it probably doesn't! It looks like a softer strike....but it probably isn't! The reverse looks like it has a lot of marks....but.....it probably doesn't....so if I have to grade based on the pics and my inability with the series....I would say AU58...because it does look like it has lots of luster(but it will be just my luck if it doesn't!)
Probably more an issue of luster breaks as opposed to rubs plus when you blow up an image, all the imperfections come out!