Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Ok new pic's & 3 diffrent coins,grade seam fair?

sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
in U.S. Coin Forum
V-nickel Au-50 brush marks?
IHC Au-58 BR?
the 1881's MS-62?
image
image
image
image
imageimage
image


Thanks! image

Comments

  • NHSBaseballNHSBaseball Posts: 2,470 ✭
    Looks PL to me- the grading services are much stricter than I am, though. Either way it's a nice looking Morgan. There are some Morgan guys on here that can give a much more informed opinion than I can.image
    "College men from LSU- went in dumb, come out dumb too..."
    -Randy Newmanimage
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They don't look PL to me.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
    Ya they have way more luster & proof look then in the pictures.
    1 sec let me try to catch the look more any tips on how to catch the proof look?
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,225 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The pics show cartwheel luster. Cool.image
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • DJCoinzDJCoinz Posts: 3,856 ✭
    Not PL, but nice luster.
    aka Dan
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Very nice image
    Bottom right one in the top picture.
    The 81 in the last pic looks like it might get a pretty high grade.
  • kryptonitecomicskryptonitecomics Posts: 9,185 ✭
    Going to be real tough to get 1879-S through 1881-S Morgans in PL holders as almost all of them come Semi-PL so they have to be extra special to get the designation. Still looks like a great group of coins!
    Kryptonitecomics Ebay Auctions
  • ChrisRxChrisRx Posts: 5,619 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>They don't look PL to me. >>



    Agreed.
    image
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    Nice looking coins Sommer but I don;t see Proof Like. Proof like should exhibit some cameo and I do not see any cameo in these coins.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472


    << <i>Very nice image
    Bottom right one in the top picture.
    The 81 in the last pic looks like it might get a pretty high grade. >>



    Ya that is how they all look
  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    Very Nice. The 1881-S Morgans are known for their strong strike and cartwheeling luster.
    Are any of them toned?

    Regards,

    John
    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • crazyinoregoncrazyinoregon Posts: 51
    all i can say is WOW. you have been posting some unbelievable coins lately.....great findsimage
    Change is good!
    my other favorite silver
    image
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
    image
    image

    All the high points face & letters/ date on front & also back letter & eagle all have a nice frosty look to them
    hard to catch the true color of the coins with my cam.

    Thanks for the comments
  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    Seems that I read some time ago that you place the coin on edge on a ruler & how far you could the numbers down the ruler in the coin's reflection determined the PL or DPL of the piece. Is this correct?

    Regards,

    John
    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    WOW! That is a strong strike even for an '81-S!
    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • GoldenEyeNumismaticsGoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭
    81-S almost always come very flashy, but the fields need to have genuine reflectivity in order to be PL.
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,998 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sorry they ain't PL.
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
    Would you guys care to take a look at this 1883 v nickel i was thinking au-58 maybe?
  • RayboRaybo Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Would you guys care to take a look at this 1883 v nickel i was thinking au-58 maybe? >>



    I'm in on the nickel!

    Show away,

    Ray
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
    *
  • HonoluluDudeHonoluluDude Posts: 2,167 ✭
    The one in the bottom right corner looks PL, but difficult to tell with the lighting. Need to take better pics.
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    Yes I agree au on the no cents 83-5¢.
  • sommerjsommerj Posts: 472
    Thanks
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,109 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Would you guys care to take a look at this 1883 v nickel i was thinking au-58 maybe? >>



    AU-55 Details, Harshly Cleaned. Worth 5 bucks.
    *For Sale on Numismy* *For Sale on Ebay*

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...