Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1957 Proof Set Pics

Are these worthe sending in for grading?


image
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • Options
    rgCoinGuyrgCoinGuy Posts: 7,478 ✭
    The obverse of the proof set is too blurry to tell much, but looks like it may be in really good condition. The center coin on the bottom is a British penny (I believe from the pictures, again too blurry to read the writing but I have some of these), I am not sure on the other ones.
    imageQuid pro quo. Yes or no?
  • Options
    dorkbardorkbar Posts: 434 ✭✭✭
    I'll have a couple of martinis and let you know on the proof set image
  • Options
    guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,308 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'll have a couple of martinis and let you know on the proof set image >>




    image
    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • Options
    From looking at your photos the center of each picture is much sharper than the edges. (It is a problem with a lot of digital cameras) If you do not find answers you might want to reshoot the coins you are still wondering about individually. They may come out a little bit better,
    Trustworthy BST sellers: cucamongacoin
  • Options
    LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,756 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Was 1957 the last time you cleaned? You gotta do that at least once a decade!
  • Options
    Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,284 ✭✭✭
    1921 and 1863? British Pennies; the type/condition I pull out of the 3/$1 junk box.

    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • Options
    JWMGT90JWMGT90 Posts: 305 ✭✭✭
    better pics loaded
  • Options
    Can't tell from the pics, but everything from 57 is pretty common, so unless you have a 70 in there (trust me, you don't)
    just leave 'em where they are.
  • Options
    21Walker21Walker Posts: 1,762 ✭✭✭
    Can't tell from the pics, but everything from 57 is pretty common, so unless you have a 70 in there (trust me, you don't)

    Unless you can see a DCAM (which I cant't see), I wouldn't waste your money.....................Rick
    If don't look like UNC, it probrably isn't UNC.....U.S. Coast Guard. Chief Petty Officer (Retired) (1970-1990)

    EBAY Items
    http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZrlamir
  • Options
    tmcsr69tmcsr69 Posts: 1,307 ✭


    << <i> Can't tell from the pics, but everything from 57 is pretty common, so unless you have a 70 in there (trust me, you don't)

    Unless you can see a DCAM (which I cant't see), I wouldn't waste your money.....................Rick >>




    I agree. I have submitted several sets that came closer to cam or dcam than these seem to and still received very disappointing grades.
    Crazy old man from Missouri
  • Options
    LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162 ✭
    I'm pretty sure that a 1957 Lincoln Cent or Jefferson Nickel in true Cameo let alone Deep Cameo would not be considered "common".
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,438 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't see anything there worth submitting.

    There is a '57 DDO nickel (actually a TDO, look at the star) but it is pretty common as well.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file