<< <i>At first I though 21, but the more I look, the more I thinks it's a 20. >>
Me too. Or a 26
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Thanks to all who responded. Looking at the date without magnification it looks like it might be a 1921 and that is what I wanted to find out if there were any other ways of telling what date it is.
Here are pictures of a 1926 and a 1916 to compare the date styles. I will say that I do have another 1926 coin that does appear to have a closed date from my photo. I do not have the coin here to check for sure.
If the OP could show a picture of his coins reverse I could say for sure if it is a coin before 1926 or a 1926 coin.
It is before 1926 for sure. The area circled in the second picture is the dead give away that the coin is not a 1926. All mercs minted during 1926 and after are missing some detail in this area. Look at the coins that Tony put up and you will see the difference in the circled area.
<< <i> It is before 1926 for sure. The area circled in the second picture is the dead give away that the coin is not a 1926. All mercs minted during 1926 and after are missing some detail in this area. Look at the coins that Tony put up and you will see the difference in the circled area.
I say its a 21 now.
Ken >>
Interesting observation! I can see stems to the leaves on the 1921 and that the 1926 shows much longer leaves extending back over the fasces. Are we thinking 1920 again?
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
Check the image of the 1926 I put up, and compare it to the area circled by Ken. It is clearly not a 1926 as the mint had repaired the dies and the stems are separated.
I think there is a very good chance it is a 1921, but without seeing it in hand there is a chance it is a 1920 with some sort of damage.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Comments
JP
Capped Bust Half Dollars by Variety & Die State Pictorial Refrence
.....................................................
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
<< <i>At first I though 21, but the more I look, the more I thinks it's a 20. >>
Me too. Or a 26
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
It's definitely not a 1926 since the nine is "open." Open nines are from before 1926.
The one's are "concave" in appearance from top to bottom and have serifs with a thick lower half. Very distinctive of 1921's
The two has a knob at the top and is more "pointed" at the lower front than a 1920.
I would suggest the poster get examples of 1920, 1921, and 1926 dated coins and compare with this example to make a decision.
My vote is 1921.
Garrow
Open nines are from before 1926
then I don't know what it is.
Proud recipient of two "You Suck" awards
Thanks
Frank
Garrow
I'm 99.9 percent certain it's a 1921. The digits of the date had a very distinct look for that year.
Compare it with the 1920, 1921 and 1926 dimes on eBay, and you'll see what I mean.
My Adolph A. Weinman signature

If the OP could show a picture of his coins reverse I could say for sure if it is a coin before 1926 or a 1926 coin.
Ken
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Here is the reverse, Thanks
It is before 1926 for sure. The area circled in the second picture is the dead give away that the coin is not a 1926. All mercs minted during 1926 and after are missing some detail in this area. Look at the coins that Tony put up and you will see the difference in the circled area.
I say its a 21 now.
Ken
<< <i> It is before 1926 for sure. The area circled in the second picture is the dead give away that the coin is not a 1926. All mercs minted during 1926 and after are missing some detail in this area. Look at the coins that Tony put up and you will see the difference in the circled area.
I say its a 21 now.
Ken >>
Interesting observation! I can see stems to the leaves on the 1921 and that the 1926 shows much longer leaves extending back over the fasces. Are we thinking 1920 again?
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
<< <i>It looks like a 1926 date to me. >>
Check the image of the 1926 I put up, and compare it to the area circled by Ken. It is clearly not a 1926 as the mint had repaired the dies and the stems are separated.
I think there is a very good chance it is a 1921, but without seeing it in hand there is a chance it is a 1920 with some sort of damage.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
The shape of the first two digits indicates it's a 1921. The 1920 and 1926 are very different.
My Adolph A. Weinman signature

Garrow