collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
I search dollars for reprinted error dollars (they have a star following the number), ones with cool numbers like 543212345 or whatever and then ones with at least 5 of the same number. All of these I have and do sell when I find them on ebay. Once found one with the signature crooked...it went for like $15. Anyway, about 1 in a hundred is collectible for some reason or another.
Clear Skies, Mark
Collecting PSA graded Steve Young, Marcus Allen, Bret Saberhagen and 1980s Topps Cards. Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
I'll be the guinea pig who will admit to NOT seeing what's so funny about this. Wouldn't a 1963 dollar have SOME extra value since it's so old and that there can't be too many left around?
Or is this some sort of glaringly obvious fraud that I'm just not seeing?
I know a few people on ebay and that is how they build up feedback, selling either "notes" or PDF files for a penny. not sure what is going on with this one, but I know for a fact this is an easy way to build feeback
Comments
Successful Deals: tennesseebanker, jvette,
Snorto~
Jake
BUT, it happens frequently.
<< <i>Unbelievable how stupid people are.
Jake >>
The buyer or the seller?
I should have sold all of mine when they were at least worth 85 cents......
got $40.00 for it
collecting RAW Topps baseball cards 1952 Highs to 1972. looking for collector grade (somewhere between psa 4-7 condition). let me know what you have, I'll take it, I want to finish sets, I must have something you can use for trade.
looking for Topps 71-72 hi's-62-53-54-55-59, I have these sets started
Clear Skies,
Mark
Raw: Tony Gonzalez (low #'d cards, and especially 1/1's) and Steve Young.
Or is this some sort of glaringly obvious fraud that I'm just not seeing?
<< <i>Wouldn't a 1963 dollar have SOME extra value since it's so old and that there can't be too many left around? >>
Book value on this dollar in this condition is $3.
<< <i>
<< <i>Wouldn't a 1963 dollar have SOME extra value since it's so old and that there can't be too many left around? >>
Book value on this dollar in this condition is $3. >>
OK, so this is really a pointless auction more than anything else.
It'd be like buying an '86 Topps Candy Maldonado PSA 5 for $0.01 with $3.00 shipping.
Now I understand.