How accurate is the pop report? Does this mean that I have the only PSA/DNA certified 86 Fleer sign

thenavarro

I just joined the Collectors Club earlier this week and have been trying to use a few of its tools, IE, pop report and SMR. When I look at the pop report for 86/87 Fleer Jordans, I only see one under PSA/DNA #57. Does this mean that I have the only PSA/DNA slabbed 86/87 Fleer Jordan? Or are the pop reports not accurate? Or, since mine is both PSA/DNA and graded a 6, would it be counted under the regular Jordan 6 column?

I am not under the delusion that I have the only Jordan signed rookie as I know there are buybacks and other signed ones that just haven't been to PSA, just wondering if I have the only one currently that has been PSA/DNA certified? If so, that's kind of neat.

Mike

Some of you saw this from my thread a few weeks ago, but here it is for this thread.

dizzle

Mike, there was or is another on ebay and I have seen a handful of others as well. very nice card by the way.

thenavarro

Thanks Dizzle, I just looked at the pop report again and I believe the pop report is just wrong, as some of the other players PSA/DNA cards from the same set, appear in the numeric columns, IE, they list as 7's, 8's or whatever they may be, and not just as AUTH.

That's kind of scary that the pop reports are off like that, as I know people who collect those registry sets pay some pretty good premiums when they think they have 1 of 1's. PSA needs to do a better job at that if they are going to report that data. I imagine if the pop report is off on a high profile card like Jordan's, that there must be a lot of errors on commons.

Mike