Should PSA Eliminate the All-Time Set Rankings?

I was thinking about the all-time finest rankings in the set registry and I wonder if it has any relevance. The reason I question this is often the top sets are the same set sold from one collector to another, or the bulk of the set being sold to another top registry participant. An example is the 1969 Topps all-time finest set being sold from Dave Cryer to Donald Spence. They are ranked #2/#1, respectively, on the All-Time Finest list, yet they are essentially the same set. I think it would be useful to list the #1 set of all time but none others in terms of retired sets. The current finest list is the most relevant and should be the most prominent on the registry.
What are your thoughts?
What are your thoughts?
0
Comments
Just an ego trip for all parties involved.
Guess thats why they keep it that way, for the collectors who matter........
Put the all time finest below, with the top 20 all time show.
Eliminate any transitive listings, such as Mastro, Memory Lane, etc once the auction has run, and don't allow them to stay on the all time finest.
Always looking for Topps Salesman Samples, pre '51 unopened packs, E90-2, E91a, N690 Kalamazoo Bats, and T204 Square Frame Ramly's
<< <i>here here. once retired, it should have a separate list. >>
Um. It does.
This must be a "full set" problem, because on the football key card and HOF sets, all of the collectors tend to pillage the sets that are going away. It is rare, if ever (I've never seen it happen) that a high ranking set sells out to a lower ranking set. I know a guy that recently left the HOF set who sold a large portion of his set to another board member, but he broke it up amongst other board members, he didn't keep it all.
I personally like seeing the all time finest to see where I rank in the "history" of the set. Sure, you can be the greatest of this era, but does your set compare to the best ever registered? I like that comparison.
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
My .02
Neil